Is joule thief circuit gets overunity?

[conradelektro]

@Itseung888:

As far as I understand, you have sent out at least 30 of your devices to various people.

Did you get any useful feed back?

Greetings, Conrad

[Void]

@Void,
I shall be sending you the items in the diagram.  They fit nicely into the plastic box.  Please review and see if you need anything else.  I shall also post the test results for all the Boards here first and outline what I believe to be the "confirmation" experiments.  You are welcome to do any additional tests.
Two spare boards 133 and 134 will be included.  You can pass them on to whomever you feel as helpful.
God Bless.

Hi Lawrence. Ok, that sounds good. Looks like I will have everything I need to run tests for you. I will posts my test results back here, if you like.

[TinselKoala]

I think void or .99 or Pirate should send a board or two to Lawrence for testing, not the other way around. I predict that Lawrence will find OU in these boards with the same ease as he does with his own.

The moral is this: If you want high COPs from your devices, you must measure them properly. A bottom-end Atten DSO is the right instrument to use. No other instruments will show you the necessary zero-crossings, therefore there is something wrong with them. Since the Atten DSO shows what is needed, it can be used, as in the latest series of shots, to support claims of OU, even though test and calibration measurements show the Atten DSO to be error prone, imprecise and inaccurate when doing normal measurements of low voltage oscillating signals.

[ltseung888]

I think void or .99 or Pirate should send a board or two to Lawrence for testing, not the other way around. I predict that Lawrence will find OU in these boards with the same ease as he does with his own.

The moral is this: If you want high COPs from your devices, you must measure them properly. A bottom-end Atten DSO is the right instrument to use. No other instruments will show you the necessary zero-crossings, therefore there is something wrong with them. Since the Atten DSO shows what is needed, it can be used, as in the latest series of shots, to support claims of OU, even though test and calibration measurements show the Atten DSO to be error prone, imprecise and inaccurate when doing normal measurements of low voltage oscillating signals.

@TK.

I believe if you try to measure OU in your youtube elecctrosmog situation, you most likely will get cross 0 ref line behavior.  Your LED will be lighted forever when your board is not connected via wires to anything.  Just let your board pick up the electrosmog.

You have shown that to be a certainty.  The next logical question is - how efficient can that process be?  Can that energy be captured and stored continuously and use when needed???

Before people know solar panels, that energy was wasted.  Can a TK device be built to use electrosmog energy???

[ltseung888]

I think void or .99 or Pirate should send a board or two to Lawrence for testing, not the other way around. I predict that Lawrence will find OU in these boards with the same ease as he does with his own.

....

That is not a bad idea - especially with those boards that can light a LED for over a year.  Board 116 has shown that there might be some sort of "sweet spot" at around 0.4V.  Board 124 with the capacitor and twin timer has shown prolonged lighting with reasonable brightness.  In my case, such behavior lasted around 2 weeks.   How can it be prolonged for over a year?

There is still much more research to be done.....