Probality of God

[gravityblock]

I watched the video with high hopes of seeing actual evidence.  I was disappointed.

Somehow this doesn't surprise me.  I will say this, I think you're sincere when saying you had high hopes and was disappointed.  This tells me you have a desire for God and for a Creator.  It's good to see you have a solid foundation which can be built on.

Gravock

[hoptoad]

snip...
Hoptoad
So whatcha think of the (snip...) Don Smith self running Flavor shavor Movie
Here  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzE-p0GJb_Q
snip...

Interesting, if it can be replicated. Circuit anyone?

[ramset]

 He is an honest fellow with sincere open source intentions and has always
done what he says he'll do.
And he says he'll post a circuit and parts list!![once he does his own replication]
this is one to watch .................
 
Thx
Chet
Ps
Toad, I see you snipped out Mr.T ??

[hoptoad]

snip...
Toad, I see you snipped out Mr.T ??

Why give T any credit when he refuses to acknowledge any of the work of predecessors upon which he has built (plagiarized) his work?
Most open sourcers readily acknowledge their inheritence of prior art, but not T. He always claims everything as being the result of only his own inventive reasoning. I acknowledge his work and possible contributions to the work of others, but not his inventiveness, as he merely builds on the work of others without giving credit to those whose ideas he has seconded.

Cheers

[eatenbyagrue]

Somehow this doesn't surprise me.  I will say this, I think you're sincere when saying you had high hopes and was disappointed.  This tells me you have a desire for God and for a Creator.  It's good to see you have a solid foundation which can be built on.

Gravock

I have a little more time now, and let me be more specific.  The video is just an exercise in some backward looking convoluted math to end up at a number you want to end up with.  This is just basically numerology, and we all know what bullshit numerology is.


A good exercise to purge yourself of the idea that this is good evidence is to try to work out the math forwards, without knowing the end number you are trying to get to.   Can you actually use the information presented to make predictions before the event happens, or is the information only good for confirming, through some convoluted logic, an event in the past?