Probality of God

[WilbyInebriated]

All arguments receive the same asinine vomit from you, "this isn't extant material evidence and/or a logical proof for the existence of your imaginary godfairy savior/creator friend?"  It's a blanket argument which is always asserted without showing the reason behind it being illogical and/or not being extant material evidence.  A dog always returns to it's own vomit.  Now, go get yourself cleaned up so you can return to wallow in the mire again.

2 Peter 2:22 states, "What the true proverb says has happened to them: The dog returns to its own vomit, and the sow, after washing herself, returns to wallow in the mire."

Gravock

so that's a no on the request for extant material evidence or a logical proof for the existence of your imaginary godfairy savior friend. thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you cannot present either.

[Tito L. Oracion]

so that's a no on the request for extant material evidence or a logical proof for the existence of your imaginary godfairy savior friend. thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you cannot present either.

nO! SATIAN YOU REALLY ARE THE EXTANT MATERIAL CAUSE YOU BELIEVE IN SOMETHING YOU DID NOT SEE!. LOLBWAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA


YOU ARE THE LIVING PROOF !!!!! YEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS 
HAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHA


LETS DRINK TO THAT AGAIN !!!!!!!! YEEEEEPPPPPPY. 


CHEEERS 

[eatenbyagrue]

How do you explain water in a free fall weightless environment?  Does the water disperse?  No it holds together.  What causes it to hold together?  Is it having it's own gravity or is there an outside force holding it together?   Remember, at that distance from the earth, the gravitational force is still 90-95%, and this rules out surface tension as a possible answer to what is holding the water together.  If this doesn't convince you, then how do you explain the tablet not breaking up the surface tension allowing the water to disperse?  Then we have the experiments by Dr. Ricardo Carezani's (Video).  I don't subscribe to the pico-graviton theory, but it may suggest gravity is a pushing force as does the water experiment.  The most rational explanation is a universal centripetal pressure holding the water together, thus gravity is more than likely a pushing force.
 
Here's my explanation and it also describes how we're stuck to the earth.  There's a centripetal force or pressure within the universe.  Wherever you place yourself in the universe, you will experience an equal pressure from all directions, thus you would have no movement on your own.  Only an external force can impart movement to a body.  When you place a massive body near your location, then this massive body interferes or shields you from this universal pressure in one particular direction, according to it's density and volume.  This causes a net force to be applied from the other direction which causes this universal pressure to push you towards the larger mass.  This means there is no attraction or interaction between the two bodies in space (mass does not attract mass).

Sunlight reflected from the Moon exerts a pressure on the liquid mass of the ocean. Being compressed at one point, this liquid is raised up at another. This is the explanation of the retardation of tides caused by the Moon.  Do you have a plausible explaination for the discrepancy in gravitational-tidal theory, when applied to massive fresh-water lakes, as they do not experience tides, though the gravitational-tidal theory indicates that they "should"?

Gravock

Water holds together in zero gravity due to electromagnetic bonding between the water molecules.  This, however, is not what makes us stick to the earth.


And about this sunlight reflected from the moon business, why does the Sun cause less of a tide than the moon?  It is so much brighter, after all.

[WilbyInebriated]

nO! SATIAN YOU REALLY ARE THE EXTANT MATERIAL CAUSE YOU BELIEVE IN SOMETHING YOU DID NOT SEE!. LOLBWAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA


YOU ARE THE LIVING PROOF !!!!! YEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSS 
HAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHA


LETS DRINK TO THAT AGAIN !!!!!!!! YEEEEEPPPPPPY. 


CHEEERS 

so that's ANOTHER no on the request for extant material evidence or a logical proof for the existence of your imaginary godfairy savior friend. thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you cannot present either.

[WilbyInebriated]

And about this sunlight reflected from the moon business, why does the Sun cause less of a tide than the moon?  It is so much brighter, after all.

i'm truly on the edge of my seat to read gravock the godtard's ad hoc rationalization to your inquiry...