Probality of God

[WilbyInebriated]

It's not problematic when you consider there is radiation pressure from the sun reflecting off the moon to the earth (which has to do with the positions of the moon, earth, and sun), radiation pressure directly from the sun (the different angles of the sun relative to the earth also plays a factor), and the centripetal radiation pressure within the universe, which the positions of the moon and sun has an influence on.

Gravock

wrong. it's completely problematic when you have a bulge where there shouldn't be one... and where there should be a bulge according to your asinine hypothesis... there isn't.    obviously that's no problem for a godtard like you... but for the rest of the scientific world, it is.

as i told you earlier, until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things... but science is not one of them.


and thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you haven't a single shred of extant material evidence nor a logical proof to present for the existence of your imaginary godfairy creator/savior friend...

[gravityblock]

Here's something I find very interesting during an experiment with surface tension of water in micro-gravity.  Don Pettit suggests the reversals in motion during the time-lapse footage, starting at 3min.30sec., may be due to air currents.  I see very minute reversals during the real footage also in the form of small jerky motions.  I don't think it would rotate as long as it did if there were air currents causing reversals.  The wire loop and thin film of water would act as a sailboat if there were air currents and there should be visible indications of it moving around, but it remains perfectly still throughout the entire video, except for when he first stirs it and between the switching from real to time-lapse footage.  Also there appears to be other fluctuations in speed of the tracer particles.  This is speculation on my part, but the reversals and changes in speed of the tracer particles could be due to small fluctuations in the centripetal pressure within the universe.

Air currents?

Gravock

[gravityblock]

wrong. it's completely problematic when you have a bulge where there shouldn't be one... and where there should be a bulge according to your asinine hypothesis... there isn't.    obviously that's no problem for a godtard like you... but for the rest of the scientific world, it is.

as i told you earlier, until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things... but science is not one of them.


and thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission that you haven't a single shred of extant material evidence nor a logical proof to present for the existence of your imaginary godfairy creator/savior friend...

I'm no longer debating or defending my position.  It's a waste of time and effort.

Gravock

[WilbyInebriated]

I'm no longer debating or defending my position.  It's a waste of time and effort.

Gravock

good. your declarations of fact based upon nothing but personal fiat were getting quite boring.

[gravityblock]

good. your declarations of fact based upon nothing but personal fiat were getting quite boring.

As were yours!

Gravock