Probality of God

[Magluvin]

How is the idea of expansion acceleration of space from mainstream science anymore plausible or less laughable than the idea of matter also undergoing expansion acceleration?  You accept one, and laugh at the other, yet you fail to realize matter is only deformed space.  Foolishness!

Video of Electrical-Mass being multiplied by Acceleration and Distance to become a greater electric charge.

Yes. Foolishness. 

I like what you have been explaining. I didnt know these things. And even though I cant feel it or see it, Im interested.

Thats the difference with some of these guys. Some assume all else is a joke beyond 'what' they know, of which must be limited, as it seems it is not just the subject of God that they reject, there are other things too.

Magzimus Leviticus

[hoptoad]

It's laughable for you to think light has an instantaneous velocity from 0 to 299,792,458 m/s, and doing so without having to first undergo a period of acceleration.  That's a belly laugh!

Gravock

Its laughable you think you know what I think. If light is undergoing acceleration it cannot be stationery.
Anything undergoing acceleration cannot be stationery.

[Magluvin]

One way to figure out if the acceleration of light exists from its starting point, would be to measure the time of travel at some large distance. Then precisely calculate the 'average' speed. Then remeasure time to redetermine the the average speed at a short distance.

If there is acceleration involved, there will be a difference in the 2 determined average speeds, due to the fact that the time of acceleration would most likely be finite, thus taking up the same amount of time for acceleration for the short and long distance tests. So the greater distance would have a higher average speed because the longer distance test, the light would spend more time at the highest speed compared to the short distance tests.

Magzimus Leviticus

[gravityblock]

Its laughable you think you know what I think. If light is undergoing acceleration it cannot be stationery.
Anything undergoing acceleration cannot be stationery.

I said space and matter are undergoing expansion acceleration.  Where did I ever say light is also undergoing expansion acceleration?  I never did.  You need to stop saying I said things which I never said.  This is becoming a pattern from you.  It is stationary because it is not undergoing expansion acceleration.  Is your thinking that swallow?


And, the only thing that is laughable about light having a 0 velocity, is you're not able to perceive this with your very limited comprehension.


Gravock

[hoptoad]

I said space and matter are undergoing expansion acceleration.  Where did I ever say light is also undergoing expansion acceleration?  I never did.  You need to stop saying I said things which I never said.  This is becoming a pattern from you.  It is stationary because it is not undergoing expansion acceleration.  Is your thinking that swallow?


And, the only thing that is laughable about light having a 0 velocity, is you're not able to perceive this with your very limited comprehension.


Gravock

You didn't say light was undergoing expansion acceleration and I never said you did!  You said light was stationery. You're entitled to say and think what you like and I'm entitled to disagree and think your idea is ludicrous. Once again thanks for the belly laugh.