Probality of God

[WilbyInebriated]

----------
As far as Scientific Rigor regarding what helps people in trouble with addiction.
I really don't like going to Funerals. and I have been running with the "Car Keys and the house wife" approach.

chetito... you idiot. we aren't talking about scientific rigor "regarding what helps people in trouble with addiction"...   that whole line of discussion was one of your RED HERRING, NON COGENT replies...  and thus, is irrelevant! how much more ignorant, stupid and belligerent can you be? and now you're lying as well?

this conversation is over... for the same reasons i stopped talking to you last time. i'm tired of reasoning with crazy people.
1. you have no clue about logic and reason
2. you refuse to learn.
3. you insist on responding exclusively with logical fallacies.

[ramset]

" "W"
If your only possible examples of what you accept as proof of a creator
are little rock miracles?
Please put me back on your ignore list.
Thx
Chet

[Qwert]

Why do you believe feelings are miracles and not explained by known science?

Well, not only "feelings" but the whole Science seems to be explainable only to some extent. Going deeper and deeper into the micro (and macro-) cosm, it become less and less clue. But the Science avoids dogma, it remains just "unexplainable"; religions are less scrupulous reserving dogmas which don't need explanation in such cases.
As I said before, "unanimated" or "dead" matter produces "animated" "life". But is it really so? Our senses see each chemical element as dead matter. In their nano levels however they vibrate, they possess electric/magnetic charges (free will? http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/35391/title/Math_Trek__Do_subatomic_particles_have_free_will%3F).
I guess, it still remains an open question how to explain unexplainable.

[WilbyInebriated]

" "W"
If your only possible examples of what you accept as proof of a creator
are little rock miracles?
Please put me back on your ignore list.
Thx
Chet

you didn't provide your methods for falsifying all the other gods chetito... nor did you provide the method used to validate yours... 

your entire response is just another one of your usual red herring logical fallacies. you are no different than tito the clown you dunce.

thank you for ANOTHER tacit admission you don't have a single shred of extant material evidence nor a logical proof for the existence of your imaginary godfairy savior friend.

[eatenbyagrue]

But the Science avoids dogma, it remains just "unexplainable"; religions are less scrupulous reserving dogmas which don't need explanation in such cases.
...
I guess, it still remains an open question how to explain unexplainable.

I am not sure I understand.  How do you know something is unexplainable or just currently unexplained?  It is the job of science to take something unexplained and explain it.  And the way it does it is through testing, reproducing trials, and so forth.  Religion just takes a shortcut to "god did it".