Probality of God

[CuriousChris]

What do you mean by 'OU has been proven impossible'?   Inability is different from impossibilty.   Wait till somebody builds  a OU device.  The device may come through this forum itself.

Do you understand the scientific method?

Go here and read up on it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method Pay particular attention to the prediction section.

For OU to be possible it would mean that the conservation of energy law is wrong.

Do you know why its considered a law? not a theory like say the theory of relativity or string theory? its not because of some arbitrary decision in some smoke filled men's science club. its because it has never failed a test. and most importantly it is used too predict the outcome of other experiments.

For example if you had an experiment and of the possible outcomes only 3 could occur without breaking the conservation of energy law. One of those is the most likely outcome. If there is another outcome it is ALWAYS one that does not violate the conservation of energy law, and was simply not considered before. This law is used and by definition tested daily in a thousand physic experiments around the world.

Now lets look at OU itself. People have been trying for at least 300 Years. NOT ONE HAS SUCCEEDED. Not once ever. Of course many have claimed to have succeeded but not one has proven it.

So when you get to heaven ask "Your God" why he didn't break one of his laws to make you happy?

Of course if you descend to hell for believing you can break Gods laws don't forget to ask Lucifer. What pissed him and the 1/3 of the angels off so much that they decided hell was a better place. Perhaps it was because they wanted to break the conservation of energy law?

[Tito L. Oracion]

http://intouch.org/broadcast/video-archives/content?topic=victim_or_victor_video#.UI3l-m8xp-I


I think this video is appropriate here, please listened, cause faith comes by hearing and hearing the word of God.


hope it may help 

[Newton II]

Do you understand the scientific method?

For OU to be possible it would mean that the conservation of energy law is wrong.

Do you know why its considered a law? not a theory like say the theory of relativity or string theory? its not because of some arbitrary decision in some smoke filled men's science club. its because it has never failed a test. and most importantly it is used too predict the outcome of other experiments.

For example if you had an experiment and of the possible outcomes only 3 could occur without breaking the conservation of energy law. One of those is the most likely outcome. If there is another outcome it is ALWAYS one that does not violate the conservation of energy law, and was simply not considered before. This law is used and by definition tested daily in a thousand physic experiments around the world.

Now lets look at OU itself. People have been trying for at least 300 Years. NOT ONE HAS SUCCEEDED. Not once ever. Of course many have claimed to have succeeded but not one has proven it.

So when you get to heaven ask "Your God" why he didn't break one of his laws to make you happy?

Of course if you descend to hell for believing you can break Gods laws don't forget to ask Lucifer. What pissed him and the 1/3 of the angels off so much that they decided hell was a better place. Perhaps it was because they wanted to break the conservation of energy law?

Scientific method is just patching up work.    Whenever a new invention is made  sceintists create theories to explain the observed phenomenon.  If some new phenomena are observed in the same invention, scientists again amend the theories with new patches to explain them.  We cannot take it as a rule that things which scientists cannot acheive and cannot explain donot
exist at all.

Law of conservation is accepted because scientists have sofar failed to build a OU device.  Even if scientists build it,  the respective Governments will not allow them to reveal it because it will cause an unrepairable economic loss to the entire world since the economy of entire world has moved too far  in a wrong direction with oil based industries. ( automobile, transportation etc.).

If somebody builds o OU device and pushes it through,  immediately scientists will come up with new patching up theories to explain it. 

GOD does not want OU to be achieved by humans because it may mark the beginning of the end.  Once you create energy you can magnify it to infinity in stages.   You know that energy can be constructive as well as destructive.  If OU device is invented and somebody finds a method to magnify its output to infinity and such a technology goes into the hands of terrorists,  then this earth will not be there in the solar system.

A simple example is, make one megawatt  perpetual DC generator and drop it deep into the sea.  It goes on releasing hydrogen into the atmosphere by electrolysis and after sometimes when it catches fire it chars all the life on this earth to death.

       

[Magluvin]

Its funny how the disbelievers argue amongst themselves. Yet  Bruce , Tito and I have no issues between each other.

Im just sitting back and observing them disagree with one another.

Interesting isnt it?

Magzimus Leviticus

[Magluvin]

"There is no such thing as truth. Only perception".

Then there is no such thing as lies also?   fools

That is what you think?  Your life must be in shambles.

And I suppose your 'perception' is 'correct' compared to others here.   And Wilby thinks he is correct, and so on....

Meanwhile, our perception is the same, Bruce, Tito and I.

Magzimus Leviticus