Probality of God

[gravityblock]

Stating that one or another person converted to Christianity or any other religion does not make the argument for god stronger. it is obvious religion is a powerful drug. A psychological drug.

I wasn't trying to make the argument for God stronger by showing how an atheist converted to a theist.  I was showing how earthly science is totally wrong in it's theory of evolution, and since this theory is one of the corner stones for most atheists, then it makes their argument against a God much weaker.   I then showed how Dr. Schroeder's argument is so powerful and if one takes all of the evidence as a whole, then the evidence points to a Creator. 

Gravock

[hoptoad]

I choose to worship the Creator and not the creation.  If you want to worship the creation (woman), then good luck with that.  I find it offensive for your hatred towards God.
snip...

I don't worship women, I respect them as equals. I do not hate god, how can  I hate something I don't believe even exists ?. I don't hate anything, but I do disdain those who perpetuate non truths amongst other things.

[CuriousChris]

Your views on Adam and Eve not being the first humans according to the bible is a view that attempts to cover up the obvious discrepancies in the bible. An apologists view.

http://bible.org/question/was-world-populated-through-incest-or-did-god-create-others-besides-adam-and-eve

The site above rejects that view and states very plainly..
"there is little doubt that Adam's sons and daughters had to have married their own sisters and brothers if the race was to populate the earth, "

This once again brings forward my argument. If people interpret the bible differently. its because their "inner god" the one they all claim shows them the truth in their own beliefs is a different inner god for each person and therefore is nothing more than their own thoughts. with ZERO attribution to one God.

I ask you. as you are a late comer to this discussion. How do you know the bible was written by the hand of God and not the construct of man.?

P.S. if all Christians are the progeny of the incestuous bible it is easy to understand their belief system.

[CuriousChris]

I wasn't trying to make the argument for God stronger by showing how an atheist converted to a theist.  I was showing how earthly science is totally wrong in it's theory of evolution, and since this theory is the corner stone for most atheists, then it makes their argument against a God much weaker.

Gravock

Yes you were, and you were trying to make one persons views more important than the millions of others views. your claim that evolution is totally wrong because of the statements of one person is an example of the selective reasoning used by followers of religion and OU and every other non science and might I add science.

[gravityblock]

Yes you were, and you were trying to make one persons views more important than the millions of others views. your claim that evolution is totally wrong because of the statements of one person is an example of the selective reasoning used by followers of religion and OU and every other non science and might I add science.

No I wasn't.  What you're referring to was actually part of the description of the video I posted. 

Gravock