Probality of God

[eatenbyagrue]

I know at this very moment God exists.  It's not something I'm hoping to learn in the future. 
Gravock

OK, how do you know this?

[Newton II]

It is the individual experience that makes people to believe in God and try know about him.


"An ounce of experience is equivalent to tonnes of knowledge"   

[gravityblock]

OK, how do you know this?

Religion:  God (spiritual, invisible, un-manifest).  Eternal, has no beginning and no end.   
Science:  Matter (physical, visible, manifested).  Can't be created nor destroyed. Has no beginning and no end.

"As Above, So Below" is an abridgement of the longer expression, "That which is above is like to that which is below, and that which is below is like to that which is above."

This phrase declares that nothing has ever existed in all of creation that was not first prefigured in the patterns of the spiritual world. All phenomena are but shadows of higher reality. Not even so much as a fleeting thought comes into being otherwise. Until this insight is absorbed into the very fabric of the soul, ascribing all creation to the Word of God, to Christ, while ultimately correct (Jn 1,3; 1 Cor 8,6; Col 1,16; Heb 1,2), reveals no depth of comprehension.

Only one thing is real, and that is Spirit, and this is exactly what earthly science does not admit.  Science conveniently overlooks consciousness or the quality or state of being aware of an external object or something within oneself when theorizing how the physical universe manifested.  It should be obvious that science is a copy of religion without God in it.  Thus, science is a false religion in and of itself (a cult).

Gravock

   

[gravityblock]

jesus fucking christ you're stupid... "all that is before me" is evidence of the sauce of the flying spaghetti monster. not your puny gawd of abraham.

there is EXACTLY THE SAME AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE FOR THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER AS THERE IS FOR YOUR IMAGINARY GODFAIRY SAVIOR/CREATOR FRIEND MORON....

NONE!

you're a delusional fucking zealot.

The sauce may be evidence for the spaghetti (both spaghetti and sauce do exist), but it's not evidence for the spaghetti to be a flying monster which has life in it (which is a figment of your imagination with no adequate evidence to support it and is a mere superstition).  I have showed how the sauce isn't adequate evidence, but you have not showed how the evidence being presented for the existence of God isn't adequate evidence.  You and others only assert it's not adequate evidence without giving a rational explanation for the rejection of such evidence.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result is insanity.  How would my next post be any different than my previous post which may have a different result.  To continue this will be nothing less than insanity.

Gravock