Probality of God

[gravityblock]

Gravock,

you just discarded what several independent major scientific institutions recently have confirmed as fully validated observations, calling these observations assumptions! Woa!

This is either beginning to reek empty self importance mixed with a fair bit of stupor since you seem to be absolutely unaware about the exactitude of todays readings documented from our fairly close neighbour Mercury, or you are not to be relied upon as mentally stable. These are the only available alternatives in this embarrasing situation for you.

Or are you believeing what you say based upon same kind of resoning as your religious belief?
Is this going to be one of these God or no God logics of you again, empty of any scientifically accepted proof?

I have learnead alot about you guys here who conditionless have succumbed to a dogmatic religious system based on a mere theory. You claim things without proper return of proof, you continously avoid anything that would disturb your own paradigm.


If you actually had some proof to back your odd claim against all those modern well founded set of observed parameters telling you the opposite, YOU WOULD HAVE PRESENTED THESE.

WHY DON'T YOU PRESENT PROOF? WERE ARE YOUR SOURCES?


Gwandau

I want to be there when you're standing before God and He says, He never knew you.  You have never thought you were right about something, then find out later how wrong you were?  Science has been wrong many of times in the past even when they thought it was completely confirmed.  You and other non-believers think it's alright to try and turn religion upside down, but yet when a person does this with science, you laugh at him.  What I'm doing to science is no different than what you're doing to religion.  It's easy to see other peoples faults, but not your own.  I hope you can see your own faults since I have brought them to light in trying to turn science upside down, as you try to do with religion.


You don't believe in Santa Clause, you don't debate this, or ask for evidence for his existence, etc., but yet this is what you do with God.  If you don't believe in God just like you don't believe in Santa Claus, then why are you debating the existence of God and asking for proof, when you don't do this with Santa Claus?  This tells me deep down inside you have a slight reason, feeling, or belief that maybe there is a God, and you're trying to confirm or deny this.


Gravock

[eatenbyagrue]

You don't believe in Santa Clause, you don't debate this, or ask for evidence for his existence, etc., but yet this is what you do with God.  If you don't believe in God just like you don't believe in Santa Claus, then why are you debating the existence of God and asking for proof, when you don't do this with Santa Claus?  This tells me deep down inside you have a slight reason, feeling, or belief that maybe there is a God, and you're trying to confirm or deny this.


Gravock

The reason we debate the existence of God and not the existence of Santa Claus is first and foremost, no one believe in Santa, so there is no one to debate.  Second, this world not not being negatively impacted by children's temporary belief in Santa Claus.  Not so with religion.

[Magluvin]

I want to be there when you're standing before God and He says, He never knew you.  You have never thought you were right about something, then find out later how wrong you were?  Science has been wrong many of times in the past even when they thought it was completely confirmed.  You and other non-believers think it's alright to try and turn religion upside down, but yet when a person does this with science, you laugh at him.  What I'm doing to science is no different than what you're doing to religion.  It's easy to see other peoples faults, but not your own.  I hope you can see your own faults since I have brought them to light in trying to turn science upside down, as you try to do with religion.


You don't believe in Santa Clause, you don't debate this, or ask for evidence for his existence, etc., but yet this is what you do with God.  If you don't believe in God just like you don't believe in Santa Claus, then why are you debating the existence of God and asking for proof, when you don't do this with Santa Claus?  This tells me deep down inside you have a slight reason, feeling, or belief that maybe there is a God, and you're trying to confirm or deny this.


Gravock

Magzimus leviticus

[gravityblock]

The reason we debate the existence of God and not the existence of Santa Claus is first and foremost, no one believe in Santa, so there is no one to debate.  Second, this world not not being negatively impacted by children's temporary belief in Santa Claus.  Not so with religion.

You don't think the world has been negatively impacted by science?  I don't see you debating against science, yet you try to use science against religion.  Religion itself hasn't negatively impacted the world.  It's the people involved in religion, just like the people involved in science, who has negatively impacted the world .  It's the people themselves who are the problem. 


Gravock

[Magluvin]

Second, this world not not being negatively impacted by children's temporary belief in Santa Claus.  Not so with religion.

And the Bible tells all about it.

Magzimus Leviticus