Probality of God

[gravityblock]

Well if its so obvious to you, explain it all on paper, submit your papers to the international science symposium and wait for the congratulatory slap on the back.

In the meantime I'll continue to accedpt theories which so far have been backed up by experimental evidence, and to ignore theories which experimental evidence has falsified.

Without verifiable data from real experiments, conclusions from vacuous thought experiments will continue to be mere opinion.

What experimental evidence has falsified what I have said in regards to gravity?  What vacuous thought experiments are you referring to?  And, why would I submit papers to the international science symposium when they have taken God out of the equation?

Gravock

[hoptoad]

I am fully aware of messenger.  This doesn't mean much to me, because NASA is a cover up for the real space program.  I'll give you an example.  A group of astronomers have reported the discovery of a new planet possibly inhabitable close to the solar system (40 light years). A group of astronomers can make this discovery with small telescopes at 40 light years away, but NASA can't confirm a massive body on the edge of our solar system which is 4 times the size of Jupiter? LOL.  NASA's WISE could confirm Tyche, but then they conveniently claim they had to shut down WISE. How can it be a hypothetical when they know it's 4 times the size of Jupiter and is made of hydrogen and helium along with where it's located? This doesn't sound hypothetical to me. Besides, NASA has known about Tyche since 1983 and it was on major US news then, but in 1984 NASA tried to cover it up. Here's a video explaining our Binary Solar System.  Everybody knows they airbrush stuff out of photos. They're only going to tell you what they want you to know, regardless if it's true or not.  Then, the general public believes their B.S.!  Of course, this is how they continue to receive funding for the real space program.

Gravock

I didn't say or imply that NASA were liars, you said they were liars. Which makes you a liar. Can you read your own words.?

[gravityblock]

I didn't say or imply that NASA were liars, you said they were liars. Which makes you a liar

This isn't experimental scientific evidence which falsifies what I have said in regards to gravity (can you say segway?).  I'm a liar because somebody else or an organization hides or covers things up?  I can't seem to wrap my mind around this. LOL

Gravock

[hoptoad]

This isn't experimental scientific evidence which falsifies what I have said in regards to gravity (can you say segway?).    I'm a liar because somebody else or an organization is a liar or cover up things?  I can't seem to wrap my mind around this. LOL

Gravock

You are a liar.      L.I.A.R.      Is that spelled out good enough for you? Your semantics won't change that. Wrap your mind around that. 

P.S. If you really can't see that you lied about me calling NASA liars, when it was you who called NASA liars, then you probably should have some physcological counselling. Why?, because a person who lies and cannot acknowledge their own lies are pathological liars.

[gravityblock]

You are a liar.      L.I.A.R.      Is that spelled out good enough for you? Your semantics won't change that. Wrap your mind around that.

You should stop lying to yourself about the existence of God.  Wrap your lying mind around that!

Gravock