Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 188 Guests are viewing this topic.

magpwr

Quote from: Jeg on September 20, 2015, 04:12:29 AM
Hi Magpwr
Why is that so important? His current meter is at his converter input. Even if he is using a ups or mains grid, the current consumption indication would be the same at converter's input.

To Jeg,

The clamp meter revealed 1Amps give or take X 220volts =220watts.But you did not factored in efficiency loss at various stages.

Hence the output is nothing of interest as no circuit be it step up or step down inverter not counting the switching loss at the IGBT or mosfet driver is ever above 90% typically around 77%...88% at each stage.

Although at a glance it was interesting at first. ;D ;D

I am bored already. 8)



NickZ

  Itsu, TK:
  Ok, I've made another test this morning to see what's the difference if using ferrite back into the core to increase the gain.
  Here's what I got now, with ferrite, still using the same scope settings, 05us/Div.  I see 5.8 sections,  of 0.1us sections , on this test. Right?  Just bare with me, I'll get this down, yet.
  This, is just as a comparison, but, I'll remove the ferrite and test again, later.

itsu


Nick,

i see 5.5 sections of 0.1us between 2 peaks or 2 zero crossings, = 0.55us which is 1.818MHz
Did you add some turns now?

Regards Itsu

Jeg

Quote from: magpwr on September 20, 2015, 07:38:36 AM
To Jeg,

The clamp meter revealed 1Amps give or take X 220volts =220watts.But you did not factored in efficiency loss at various stages.


Magpwr
This demonstration is supposed to be an OU. In every system there are losses of course but in Urfa's video the brightness of 1Kw bulb is more than I could expect from a conventional system. The angry spark as Hoppy says is really angry :)
Keep the good work

Jeg

NickZ

  No, same amount of turns, so that is the bandwidth spread that the ferrite can induce. Yes, it lowers the frequency, but can be used to fine tune to better match the induction circuit's frequency. And it can also increase the voltage output levels. As I don't have other means of fine tuning, I use ferrite, and magnetite on the yoke, if they work to improve the output.
  Ferrite seam to works better at certain frequencies, but does not seam to do much to increase gain at other frequencies.

   I probably do need to remove some more turns, and get the frequency up to 2.4Mhz if possible, to see if that does anything, unusual, at the 1:100 ratio. I'm betting that it will, we'll see.
Going there now...