Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 129 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Quote from: Tomtech29 on October 04, 2015, 05:53:46 AM
Hi.
I would like to know what the system introduces some changes in the operation yoke  what type of "Tr1" experience bath use,how much will be the number of turns of the winding on the small ring ferrite core ?

Hi Tomtech,

I cannot comment on the PLL circuitry because I have not built and experimented with this. However, my experience using the push-pull driving the yoke is that the power rails are 'spiked' leading to the linear voltage regulators serving the oscillator and other parts of the device being stressed and overheated. The UR4007 protection diodes shown on the ALLEGGA circuit are IMO inadequate and a 'clamp' winding as detailed by Verpies is ideally needed to clean-up the yoke output waveform.

Jeg

Thank you Hoppy. For sure there is a discrepancy between our measurements. Your 60T at a lower diam. tube than mine gives you almost 37m. I measured almost 37m in my grenade in bigger tube and higher turns (68T). Someone is wrong. I am afraid that I have to unwound my coil to measure it as I calculated its length mathematically after winding process. 

Tomtech29

Quote from: NickZ on October 03, 2015, 11:32:17 PM
  Ok, well thanks for that.  I guess there may be something wrong with that reading, and I don't mean the math.
I thought that it was reading 5Mhz, not 2Mhz, or 500Khz, but it is what it is. In any case, the frequency should be much higher than that 500Khz.
I'll try it again with the 50ohm resistor and using the square wave signal.
I don't understand why it might be showing such a low reading. I'll see what I can do.
  Thanks again.


Hi. NickZ
as previously mentioned Itsu there are many uncertainties: what is the capacity of the coil Granada and lack of appropriate instruction where there is a catch in this...
One rule to determine if the behavior of the coil to establish its resonance peaks if such are to be at low and high frequencies I have no recipe for that
but I would suggest, and to hear from you what you think on this kind of resonance grenade search :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCXJfnRzajA

Of course mode when you add a resistor with a capacitor everything will change
so I was thinking how differently bite its raw this frequency range.

T-1000

Quote from: Jeg on October 04, 2015, 04:29:12 AM
Hi Tinsel
IF the first longer two layers are both cw, then the other four shorter layers are ccw.
Each leg windings are opposite to previous leg with 2 layers each.

Hoppy

Quote from: T-1000 on October 04, 2015, 08:00:27 AM
Each leg windings are opposite to previous leg with 2 layers each.

This is where I and some others have gone wrong from trying to work out winding directions from Ruslan's early video shots of his grenade!! I must admit that from digging out and reading your past conference notes again that you do describe the winding method in detail and it does state cw,ccw,cw or ccw,cw,ccw. Thanks for this reminder.