Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

  Tomtech:
  You said, "ferrite rod changes the frequency deviation by changing the inductance it is only for the duration of the experiment!
coil grenade must play with a coil antenna + Tesla!".
   
   What do you mean by that? Only for the duration of the experiment?
 
  And you said,
"-when you are running oscillator @sc5200 Kacher  connect properly grounded ,and you will know at which frequencies work your
grenade what effect you get!"

   What do you mean by that?

  Hoppy: You are comparing your previous stuck fet issue, with extra power output due to sycronization.  Not the same thing.
And even if it were, then that might mean that only one fet is actually needed to see any extra power "effect".

  Itsu:  You keep bringing up the Tesla fireballs, as if that is going to help us find the solution here. A one time flipping of the switch is not the same as continual free power.  Please stay on the topic.
  If Oleg and the "boys" really wanted us to know how to make this device work, they would send us some ready made boards.
Since Ruslan is not trying to sell this device to the Germans or Chinese, that shouldn't be a concern.  Or is it?

[Hoppy]

You're wrong strengthening works even in mozlill system :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m7TVIKrDno
he showed how the grenade coil acts on the high-frequency band Tesla coil
-the same impulse does not light bulbs with tesla coils ok.

Tomtech,

When you say "he showed....", who are you referring to because you are posting a link to your video? 

There is obviously going to be some coil interaction through induction affecting bulb brightness. I'm just suggesting that in the case of the TL494 push-pull driven yoke, that the Kacher HV may be affecting the push-pull driver mosfets to enhance the effect and that this may be why Nick, using the Mazilli is seeing very little, if no effect. I was certainly getting a very much stronger reaction on bulb brightness, than shown in that video.

[NickZ]

  T-1000:
  quote: " Before looping the output power to the input the effect already have to be in place. Also the power input most come from isolated and not grounded power source."

  Ok, I get that, but what happens if the grounding of the power source is from the grid.  Fireballs?  Just joking.

  So, this should mean then that, the "amplication effect" should happen even when using only a couple of 12v batteries. 
But, if this were true then the feed-back loop would not be needed. But, it is. Because the batteries will still run out of charge. Unlike the SR 193 device, which takes nothing from the input source once kick-started.
Also, the feed-back path can possibly be returned to the batteries, instead,  to keep them continually being re-charged while the device is running. This might be an easier approach, which would allow the batteries to last longer than 15 minutes while lighting 500+ watts or more worth of bulbs. 
  In any case, the idea of power amplification could be used to simply make a device more efficient, from what ever input source. Even if it doesn't self run. That in itself is an important consideration, such as when the input is connected to the device using  solar panels, and therefore be able to double or triple the normal output from the solar panel source. Like Hoppy or Itsu could do.

[Hoppy]

I see some misunderstanding here. The PSU input should be connected to the output of the grenade coil with diodes FBR and capacitor not main grid. The power amplification is essential for COP >= unity. Before looping the output power to the input the effect already have to be in place. Also the power input most come from isolated and not grounded power source.

Yes, thanks for clarifying where the input to the PSU should come from for the initial power test. However, I'm still not clear how you would establish / measure that there is a power amplication prior to looping back? The tuned bulb load presumably also needs to be connected in-front of the PSU as shown in schematics, in which case the total power consumed by the device will have to factor in the no-load power consumption of the PSU. I've never seen Kapanadze, Ruslan or Akula demonstrate this procedure; they appear to just tap the battery onto the device and hey presto, the lamps shine brightly and continue to shine  brightly when the battery is removed.

I appreciate that you have not built this device and am basing your knowledge on what the Russian underground guys are telling you but we clearly do need to establish a technically sound procedure for power measurements on this particular device.

[Hoppy]

 
  Hoppy: You are comparing your previous stuck fet issue, with extra power output due to sycronization.  Not the same thing.
And even if it were, then that might mean that only one fet is actually needed to see any extra power "effect".

No Nick. I'm comparing it with the effect that has been achieved by others with a non-synchronised device and saying that my varying light effect is not giving me any power amplification as a result of Kacher influence on the grenade / inductor coils. This may well indicate that PLL synchronisation is needed / essential to reveal a power amplification and that without it self-running success cannot be achieved.