Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

    @ Hoppy:
     I just saw this Dynalight PC microscope, and as you being our house detective and all, I thought it may interest you. If you already have one, or know about it, well, maybe the other guys might like to check this video out. I though that its cool, in any case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfvGiGpcyMM

  DSR Diode: 180 watt upper limit
                    http://www.seekic.com/icdata/DSR180-12-14.html
 

[Hoppy]

    @ Hoppy:
     I just saw this Dynalight PC microscope, and as you being our house detective and all, I thought it may interest you. If you already have one, or know about it, well, maybe the other guys might like to check this video out. I though that its cool, in any case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfvGiGpcyMM

  DSR Diode: 180 watt upper limit
                    http://www.seekic.com/icdata/DSR180-12-14.html

Thanks for the link Nick. That down to pixel level device looks great for sniffing out those bugs and a good upgrade to my well used mag glass. However, I would prefer one that could Xray into those out of sight 'hidey holes' and other places that other cameras won't dare to venture

[Hoppy]

Regarding the Ikako Chibinidze video:

First I agree with verpies thoughts on the flyback transformer.

I'd like to add that we should be able to rule in or rule out normal transformer induction of the RF  output coil with a bit of reverse engineering if we could get a handle on the following:

1) What is the actual power dissipation in the bulb?

2) What is the size of the gap (voltage breakdown)

3) What is the value of the discharge capacitor i.e how many pulses per second of what energy magnitude are required to transfer the required power to light the lamp?

Then we could take a closer look at the flyback transformer. Modern flybacks from TV sets are designed with multiple secondary windings to handle the power for the entire set. The high voltage winding is much lighter duty, designed to maintain anode potential on the CRT being lost by electron emission from the cathode.
Can this winding really support the power dissipated in the lamp?

The ferrites (as noted by verpies) are designed for flyback operation not forward push pull operation. But I doubt the HV secondary can handle enough current to provide 200 Watts or more of power. I could be wrong but would like to attempt to disqualify normal transformer induction in the RF output coil.

We might guess from the video  that the two 80 turn windings are bifilar and presumably wound in the same direction. This would put the dots at one end of the coil form for these wires. Let us assume the dot wires feed the transformer. This would create a null output for ordinary induction as the pulse voltage would effectively cancel (not counting the smaller winding with the capacitor).


Food for thought and summary:
If the two 80 turn windings are in series connection (properly phased for normal induction) then all we have is a RF transformer being pinged at the spark gap frequency. This could probably light the bulb shown, but the spark in the gap does not look intense enough to carry that wattage considering the turns ratio 3:160. The flyback transformer HV winding alone may not be designed to carry the power being demonstrated. If anyone can estimate the gap distance, we would have a good idea how high the capacitor is charging before discharge in the gap. We can then calculate the energy per pulse (if we knew the cap value) and get the approximate necessary pulse repetition rate to sustain the lamp at some reasonable level of brightness as shown in the video.

If none of this adds up, we have something unknown and  interesting going on in the RF output coil. Keep a rad meter handy.

Also note that the output transformer is a good quality ferro-mag type and I have found that this build type has a better higher frequency response than the more conventional square iron cored transformers.

I'm currently attempting a replication of this device so will be staging a competition for the first to find the 'X' wire. 

[NickZ]

  Hoppy: Glad that you liked the pc microscope link, and also, glad to hear that you're threatening to get your hands dirty.  No hiden hole X-wire thingies, please, as we don't have X-ray.  The only X-rays are going to be the ones coming from your new device. Ha!

I tried to listening to Wesleys rap on rads video, but fell asleep waiting for the good part, as it was almost 1am when I was listening.  But, I'm still waiting for the results, on a shorter personal video that I can view all the way through. However I did hear the part about the previous original yoke device, and how it was also a self runner.
  So, T-1000, the yoke is NOT just used for the high voltage pulses, only, at least in that case.  Or is it?

  Vortex1:  The 80 turn windings are both wound in the same direction, single layer, and possibly are not bifilar wound, but it's hard to tell.
Anyone, please add your thoughts, corrections, X-wire suspicions, etz...

  Verpies: I'm considering just using a single TIP 3055 or similar transistor for this akula 0083 type of replication, as I don't want to use a fly back, and spark gap set up.
  I think that the only reason that most guys are using two FETs or NPN transistors, are either to share the load, or to have a twin circuit like I'm working with currently for (gutted Cfls). But, as I love simplicity, using a single regular power transistors like the 2n3055, TIP 3055, or D13007K may be a easier, and more in line of my way of doing things. Such as with the LaserSaber 3.0 circuits that use only one component, just the one transistor for switching.. As I don't see that two transistors are necessary, in order to at least see the effect. I can also start with one, and add another one, later. I thought that I heard you mention something along those lines. So, what do you think?
  I'm ready to go on this...

[MenofFather]

My Siberian Husky (itsu) died 2 years ago, so no more chasing there, and if i am chasing wild geese, i am not sure, i do a lot of things which lead to nothing lately.
Anyway, i am still around, and still have the Dally parts waiting for additional info.
But i doubt we will get it.
Same with this new Dally thingy, seems to good to be thru, and if i see that also this guy has disappeared, i don´t think i will invest any time in it for the time being.
It would be better if one of our Russian friends do a replicate, they know the language, and have access to the parts (like the Russian made yoke which seems to be needed).
Regards Itsu

Dally divice not have yoke.
There is schematic http://realstrannik.ru/media/kunena/attachments/3866/Dally---mikmur--3.png
There is two frenquences. One is sinus about 150 volts, about 2 kiloherc. Other is 1000 volts short nanoimpulses. Let say frenquency it about 10-400 megaherc. How many turns have each coil is shown in picture. Then from 83 turns coil going to diode bride, then from it to capasitors 4 mikrofarads 400 volts x 4, then to old power suply for PC computer, who convert from 220 volts to 12 volts. From 12 volts to generators 150 volts about 2 kiloherc sinus and 1000 volts nanoimpulses. You can make 2 kiloherc about and 150 volt sinus with any other metod or nanoimpulses 1000 volts. But there very important is ajusting. Ajusting frenquency nanoimpulses and duty cycle.