Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

As I said in the postings, it is the _fastest rise and fall times_ that produce the highest voltage rise in the secondary. Your figures show that the DC offset doesn't matter, just as I said. 

Yes, the experiment clearly illustrates that DC Offset does not matter in the long run (the DC offset makes a significant difference only in the first few cycles).
However, a switched voltage source (Diag.3) is needed for true flyback operation and for achievement of high voltages that are not related to the turns ratio.

This is because in theory, an alternating voltage source (sine or square) has zero impedance at the zero-voltage-crossing, while a switched voltage source has infinite impedance when that switch opens.  Thus, there is a huge operating principle difference between Diag.2 and Diag3.

A Royer oscillator driver produces a sine wave stimulation and so does not attain the highest voltage possible. But it transfers power effectively, which was the original issue, I believe.

No, the goal was to generate as short and as powerful pulse as possible, in order to generate a dense spectrum of many frequencies simultaneously (for LC or NM resonance excitation without tuning). 
This feat is best accomplished by discharging High Voltage (kV) from a low ESR capacitor, or using a High Current (kA) DSR Diode. 
A transformer operating in true flyback mode (Diag.3) is capable of charging such capacitor to High Voltage, the best of all these three options.

Now, let's see a _real_ minimum component count square wave switcher compared to a Royer oscillator driver in actual performance, not from a perfectly square _simulation_ input waveform.

I can't beat a Royer at its simplicity, but I can beat its performance for this application.

Does a 30 v p-p sine wave drive have the same power as a 30 v p-p square wave?

No, power is related to the RMS Value of a waveform and for a sine wave it is 0.707 and for a square wave it is 1.  See here.

[dllabarre]

However, a switched voltage source (Diag.3) is needed for true flyback operation and achievement of high voltages not related to the turns ratio.

Thank you for running those tests.

How about posting a real schematic of a switched voltage source circuit to power an old donuts style flyback? 

[NickZ]

   Hoppy:
   He is showing that he can light two small bulbs with his power supply. But, doing it with all those straggly wires,  is really something.  Kind of what Romanovs is showing, but he's using over 3 amps to light one bulb.  Free energy at last.... well, I had to open that bottle.

[verpies]

How about posting a real schematic of a switched voltage source circuit to power an old donuts style flyback?

But, that would be only one transistor in place of the switch in Diag.3 

Also, that diode D1 in Diag.3  is not optional for flyback operation and it should be oriented in such direction as to prevent current flow when the switch (transistor) is conducting.

The optimal pulse width (conduction time) of the switch heavily depends on the inductance of the primary winding and on the saturation flux density of the core.

P.S.
Resistors R1 and R2 can be omitted if the switch (transistor) can handle that.
You can read this article about calculating the optimal pulse widths.

[dllabarre]

But, that would be only one transistor in place of the switch in Diag.3 

Also, that diode in Diag.3 is not optional for flyback operation and it should be oriented in such direction as to prevent current flow when the switch (transistor) is conducting.

The optimal pulse width (conduction time) of the switch heavily depends on the inductance of the primary winding and on the saturation flux density of the core.

Thank you!