Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 107 Guests are viewing this topic.

Void

Quote from: verpies on February 15, 2016, 04:30:18 AM
In case of the latter - do you want the phase shift to stay fixed as the output frequency of the TL494 is varied ?

Hi Verpies. On second thought, it would be quite useful to have a phase shift circuit which triggers off an output
of a TL494, and which maintains a constant phase shift as the TL494 frequency is adjusted up and down.
Typical frequency range of the TL494 we are testing with is in the range of about 10 kHz to 35 kHz, but if such
a phase shift circuit can work with an even wider TL494 frequency range, that would be a bonus. I plan to test with
the  TL494 circuit you have posted in this thread previously (attached). If you do have the time at some point
to design such a circuit which can adjust phase shift from at least 0 to 90 degrees, and which will maintain it's phase
shift setting as the TL494 frequency is changed, that would probably be of very good use to anyone here who is using
the TL494 or similar as their PWM chip. If you are busy, then no problem. :)


verpies

Quote from: Void on February 19, 2016, 11:36:11 AM
If you do have the time at some point to design such a circuit which can adjust phase shift from at least 0 to 90 degrees, and which will maintain it's phase shift setting as the TL494 frequency is changed, that would probably be of very good use to anyone here who is using the TL494 or similar as their PWM chip. If you are busy, then no problem. :)
Please help Itsu with his push-pull problem.  That will free us to do just that.

verpies

Quote from: itsu on February 19, 2016, 11:29:52 AM
Enable at 12V should be fine, see specs.
I see the footnote #3 now : "whichever is larger" so 12V should be fine.

Quote from: itsu on February 19, 2016, 11:29:52 AM
Shorting both secondaries and measuring one primary gives 5.7uH
Shorting the other primary too then gives 4.5uH
That's significant. You can jusge the coupling coefficient of your transformer by these numbers.
I usually keep the leakage inductance below 1μH with special winding techniques.

So the spikes caused by this leakage inductance present a real danger to your MOSFETs in the form of exceeding its maximum drain to source blocking voltage.

What is the leakage inductance measured with only one half of the primary shorted?

verpies

Quote from: itsu on February 19, 2016, 11:29:52 AM
Enable at 12V should be fine, see specs.
I see the footnote #3 now : "whichever is larger" so 12V should be fine.

Quote from: itsu on February 19, 2016, 11:29:52 AM
Shorting both secondaries and measuring one primary gives 5.7uH
Shorting the other primary too then gives 4.5uH
That's significant. You can judge the coupling coefficient of your transformer by these numbers.
I usually keep the leakage inductance below 1μH with special winding techniques.

So the spikes caused by this leakage inductance present a real danger to your MOSFETs in the form of exceeding its maximum drain to source blocking voltage.

What is the leakage inductance measured with only one half of the primary shorted?

itsu


Please don't spend to much time on this minor problem, afterall, the thing is doing what it suppose to do creating lots of reactive power in the secondary series LC /inductor.



Releasing the secondary shorts, and measuring one side of the primary gives 58.8uH.
Shorting then the other primary gives 17.2uH

Itsu