Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 89 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: itsu on March 20, 2016, 09:31:42 AM
Drain/gate screenshots of the new layout, as mentioned, they look similar as the old layout ones.
Yes, they look well.

Notice that there are no waveform excursions above 2*VCC.
Below the 2*VCC level clamps and snubbers must be inactive so they cannot do anything about the oscillations below that level ...by design.

Also , the gate waveforms are clean and rectangular with only minor spikes  ...maybe due to reflections.

Quote from: itsu on March 20, 2016, 09:31:42 AM
I think I could improve on the layout on the yoke windings, but the present resulting output will do for the moment.
Yes, it's sufficient just to keep it in mind for now.

Void

Quote from: Hoppy on March 20, 2016, 06:21:30 AM
Yes, of course it would be rather dumb to leave an 'X' wire visible, especially when there are several ways to route a hidden wire or two into the device given the type of environment we see in that video. However, its also possible that slip-ups happen and wires get exposed through carelessness. Its therefore not necessarily strange that the lamp array panel was moved to show a glimpse of the wiring behind it and the table and device were lifted and yet neither the electric fire or the fan were moved out of position. Hopefully he will do a much more believable update video for 2016.

Hi Hoppy. There is nothing a person could do/show in a video that would 100% eliminate the
chance of tricks. Whether Kapanadze or someone else did better in some other video, there could
be no way to say for certain that there were not tricks involved. However, Kapanadze has allowed
people to come and inspect his devices close up in person, so the chances of him using a simple trick of hidden
wires seems not so likely at this point.


Quote from: Hoppy on March 20, 2016, 06:21:30 AM
I disagree with you in respect of the Aqua2 video, as there is no video evidence that the earth braid was disconnected and fully inspected inside. If Kapanadze really had a self-runner that functioned with a single conductor earth, surely he would have delighted the inspection team by allowing a full disconnection and inspection with video evidence of this event and even footage that showed the device running with it disconnected, as it was claimed was possible. An event of this importance would almost certainly have been captured on video had TK allowed it. We have to presume that permission was not granted.

I think you are making it much more complicated than it really was. :)  They had the opportunity to
inspect the ground wire and ground connection point up close. It was pretty straight forward from
what can be seen in the video. The ground lug was a bolt embedded in the cement. They were allowed to
inspect that connection point up close. I personally think they would have to have been pretty blind and
dumb to not notice a trick of a live wire inside the ground wire when inspecting that ground wire and ground
connection point up close. :)

I realize that even when people inspect a device up close that they could at least potentially be missing
some other type of trick if they are not allowed to get right down to the nitty gritty of measuring on wires
and circuits with scopes and meters, etc., but the aquarium 2 video for me seems to at least make it not too likely
that there were hidden wires to the load, or a live wire inside the ground wire. I know that doesn't sit well
with what you want to believe, but I think it is pretty hard to get around that in any reasonable way.
Just my own opinion, of course. :)

itsu

Quote from: NickZ on March 20, 2016, 10:48:41 AM
  Itsu:
  What does your output actually do. Can it light any of your 100w bulbs without the HV? 
 
  As there's more than one way to connect the two induction circuits together. Or, they can be run separate from each other.
  If the 168t coil is not connected to the yoke, and is used as just the output coil, like some diagrams are showing, the output is much lower. But, will the "effect" be manifested, or not? That's the main question. 
   Have you gotten your HV circuit or Kacher going yet, along with this new set of yoke drivers?

   I've been using the Tv horizontal output transistor C5297 or similar, as my Kacher's transistor, as that is what I had on hand.  It's 1500v, 8A.  Do you think that these type of transistors can be connected to the rectified yoke output of the 28t/168t yoke/grenade circuit. And beprovided with the full rectified output from the yoke?  They get pretty hot already with no fan and just a heat-sink,  even with just the 24v and 10A input from my PS,  drawing around 2 amps? Why do they get hot?
   
 
   Do your diodes at the full bridge rectifier get hot, or not?  Do they get hot when using 300-400w or even 1000w loads.
  Do your IRFP260N get hot at higher loads?
  As at a 40w load my circuits stay cool also, at that low of a load.
However your 40w bulb seams to be only lit to about 1/2 brightness, or so. Is that correct, as it hard to tell on the video?
  That 40w load on your system, is not enough of a load to know if the system will also work at 1000-2000w, or not. Without overheating, or burning up.
  So, can you please answer my questions, when you can.
                                                                                      Cheers.

Hi Nick,

Not sure why you want to know all this, as its now just a push/pull driven transfomer, but here it goes:

it can light any or all of the 9 100W bulbs plus the 40W bulb, but the more bulbs i add, the lower the resulting DC voltage and thus light becomes.
With 9 100W bulbs and the 40W bulb connected, the 24V battery input is 7.5A (180W) and this is divided over all 10 bulbs (glowing only).
In this condition the MOSFETs (uncooled still) temperature rises to about 37°C each, the FWBR diodes stay cold (22°C).


I won't be using a kacher, so i am looking into using some other way of "disrupting pulses", but i am not there yet.

I checked on the 40W bulb when running alone (so without other bulbs or the 24V PS), there is 227V DC on it at 136mA which calculates to 30W  (confirmed by my scope math function), so it runs at ¾.
 
I cannot comment on your kacher transistor, but 24v * 2A = 48W which can heat up a lot of things.
If it is rated for 1500V, it should be able to handle the 227V DC or so from the 28T / grenade, but you should keep an eye on the current, so good cooling is a must.

In this simple setup i have now, i do not expect to get more wattage out then the 24V * 7.5A = 180W i put in, why should it?

Itsu

Hoppy



Hi Void,

Thanks for your reply. I think we all agree that 100% elimination of tricks on video is not possible. Its not a case of me wanting to believe its a fake, just that I consider it very likely that trickery was involved, in the absense of anything that strongly indicates otherwise. Or to put it more simply, I have a different way of looking at this than you.

Hoppy

Quote from: Void on March 20, 2016, 11:39:55 AM

I think you are making it much more complicated than it really was. :)  They had the opportunity to
inspect the ground wire and ground connection point up close. It was pretty straight forward from
what can be seen in the video. The ground lug was a bolt embedded in the cement. They were allowed to
inspect that connection point up close. I personally think they would have to have been pretty blind and
dumb to not notice a trick of a live wire inside the ground wire when inspecting that ground wire and ground
connection point up close. :)


I've posted a couple of times in the past about how thin wires could have both handled the load and taken through the crimp and into the ground with nothing visible externally, even by close visual inspection.  I'm sure any competent test & inspection team would have removed the crimp had they been allowed to do so so and would have filmed the process. There is no video evidence that this was done.