Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 80 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: MenofFather on March 31, 2016, 04:02:44 AM
He says, that it is better to use a thyristor, then it will be more efficient.
When ON, Thyristors have much higher voltage drop than MOSFETs.
Consequently thyristors convert more electric energy into heat, compared to MOSFETs.

verpies

Quote from: MenofFather on March 31, 2016, 04:28:32 AM
For 1000 volts you can use IGBT transistor. Maybe better than MOSFET and than thyristor.
IGBTs are slower than MOSFETs.
IGBTs have a higher i*v product at slow speeds, though.   ...but MOSFETs are more efficient above 100kHz.

Read this.

T-1000

Quote from: verpies on March 31, 2016, 07:00:13 AM
They have a higher i*v product at slow speeds, though.
About speed in these days, it can go up to megahertz range, see my datasheet link of ST IGBT in my previous post. ;)
The Turn-on delay time + Turn-off delay time is the limit. For STGW40H120DF2 it is 36+161ns which is limiting frequency to 5.07614213MHz.

verpies

Quote from: T-1000 on March 31, 2016, 07:05:25 AM
About speed in these days, it can go up to megahertz range, see my datasheet link of ST IGBT in my previous post. ;)
That's maximum switching speed, not efficiency which Menofather, brought up.
Above 100kHz a MOSFET will be more efficient every time.

Quote from: T-1000 on March 31, 2016, 07:05:25 AM
The Turn-on delay time + Turn-off delay time is the limit. For STGW40H120DF2 it is 36+161ns which is limiting frequency to 5.07614213MHz.
An at that frequency the IGBT will spend most of its time switching while the efficiency is horrible compared to a MOSFET which would have switched long time ago and have been idling ON for a significant fraction of the entire cycle.

T-1000

Quote from: verpies on March 31, 2016, 07:13:40 AM
That's maximum switching speed, not efficiency which Menofather, brought up.
Above 100kHz a MOSFET will be more efficient every time.
An at that frequency the IGBT will spend most of its time switching while the efficiency is horrible compared to a MOSFET which would have switched long time ago and have been idling ON for a significant fraction of the entire cycle.
Not going to argue with you and will just do little Tesla coil driving tests instead.
And about MOSFETs, for example, the IRFP460 is worse than this - https://www.fairchildsemi.com/datasheets/IR/IRFP460C.pdf
Turn-On delay time 110 ns
Turn-On Rise Time 150 ns
Turn-Off Delay Time 380 ns
Turn-Off Fall Time 180 ns