Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

Void :
See the diference between you test circuit and  my circuit  in scope :
The wave seems very different or not ?  See very well . Do you think my circuit is a "simple joule thief" ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfpG9wFw4iI

I already say that my work is not a bluff , or a fake like some guys put in youtube , i provide some important information and lecture about people really need to read and understand .
I already say that is important understand some concepts by Tesla  that he left to us like extra coil , even the wireless transfer , that are misunderstood by the most but , most of you can think out of box ... what a pity  because some of you are, or were electronics engineers and have the necessary formation to understand certain subjects displayed here, and instead some are limited to guess or speculate whether it is true or not the work of some persons.

I say several times :
is not by  induction what people search... and people run say that is not possible and is a joke bla bla bla .

People look well to that video and judge what  type of power transfer is used in  this model test circuit https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bXVlS3a_rPPV9nO1vHv4DYxU88SFzE9TWA/view?usp=sharing

Is a normal induction transfer ?

Hi Nelson. I think you may have misunderstood mate. Nick asked how an exciter circuit
could run with less than 10 mA. A standard joule ringer will do that, so I quickly put together a
standard joule ringer circuit using an iron core AC power transformer which I had handy to show Nick
that a standard blocking oscillator circuit can run at even 100 uA current draw and even less.
I was not implying that the quick demo circuit I put together was the same as the circuit you are using.

I have watched a number of your videos already as well as read your various comments here recently,
so I know your circuit setup has some differences from the standard blocking oscillator circuit I did a
quick demo of for Nick. I realize that you are doing some things differently in your setup, and I also have
done a fair bit of experimenting in the past couple of years or so with some of the approaches that
you seem to be using in your setup, so I think I have some ideas about what you are doing in your own circuits,
although I am not certain of various details. I am continuing with my own experiments in which I
am experimenting with various different concepts and ideas. I do appreciate your comments here Nelson and
I have been paying attention. I will be trying some more experiments along the lines of what I think you may
be doing in your own setup, as although I have already done a number of experiments along this line on my own in
the past couple of years already, your self running demo video has got me thinking I should experiment
with such approaches even more, as based on your device demo it looks promising. There seems to be at least
some overlap with what is being done in Akula's second self runner circuit which some people have been trying to
replicate in this thread.
All the best...

[Stela]

Hoppy:
Why do you think the circuit is a "simple" joule thief? It's not even comparable!
Simple is you think that! I worked immense months in  this circuit observing all possible and impossible points scrutinizing every detail in order to understand certain aspects that were crucial to advance.

Magpower was the only one who knew how to give the benefit of the doubt and i have authorized to replicate the same, giving me after test the circuit , the credit  and say in private  message that I was not bluffing and apologized to me for being aggressive at first sight about my claims.
This circuit and others that i made  has nothing to do with joule thief! Is a approach to learn and think about are observed .


Nick:
If you remember well my words months ago I said:
It is not necessary to use the karcher circuit to get the same effect of karcher,can be achieved more "economically" with another type of approach, without having to use the same expensive configuration as Ruslan use. This is the reason in that time to share the circuit exciter , but well i misunderstood.

Void :

See the diference between you test circuit and  my circuit  in scope :
The wave seems very different or not ?  See very well . Do you think my circuit is a "simple joule thief" ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfpG9wFw4iI

I already say that my work is not a bluff , or a fake like some guys put in youtube , i provide some important information and lecture about people really need to read and understand .
I already say that is important understand some concepts by Tesla  that he left to us like extra coil , even the wireless transfer , that are misunderstood by the most but , most of you can think out of box ... what a pity  because some of you are, or were electronics engineers and have the necessary formation to understand certain subjects displayed here, and instead some are limited to guess or speculate whether it is true or not the work of some persons.

I say several times :
is not by  induction what people search... and people run say that is not possible and is a joke bla bla bla .

People look well to that video and judge what  type of power transfer is used in  this model test circuit https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bXVlS3a_rPPV9nO1vHv4DYxU88SFzE9TWA/view?usp=sharing

Is a normal induction transfer ?

Yes is normal induction. No magie . 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNB7v8mCQbc&feature=youtu.be

[AlienGrey]

I can't get it to run all i get is a circle of dots with a brighter dot running around it

What sort of induction are we talking about magnetic ? no!

In this video Cristef (sorry if spelling is wrong) it's static where he is exciting the ambient, any thing metal becomes alive with energy.

He was on here trying to help but they pissed him off ! haven't seen him till now, a clever guy, where ever he is !

[nelsonrochaa]

Yes is normal induction. No magie . 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNB7v8mCQbc&feature=youtu.be

Hi Stela ,

Very nice demo you show but  Will ask you that :
Did you use or not a close loop primary  in your Tesla  coil Transmitter to make your demo ?  That is the diference between what i show and what you show But even that i like much your presentation

[NickZ]

  Nelson:
  You mentioned,
  "Nick:
If you remember well my words months ago I said:
It is not necessary to use the karcher circuit to get the same effect of karcher,can be achieved more "economically" with another type of approach, without having to use the same expensive configuration as Ruslan use. This is the reason in that time to share the circuit exciter , but well i misunderstood.

  OR, maybe I misunderstood.  So, what I think that you're saying is, that your device uses more like an "Exciter Circuit", which is more economical to run than the Kacher circuit, and yet it radiates the surrounding ambient similar to what the Kacher can do, but using small coils, and drawing only mAs, instead of amps.  Right?
   So, I know there's more to it, and I'm still wondering what that might be, or how it actually works, to cause that higher amplification at the output.
   But, Nelson if you'd like to see me replicate your device, just let me know.  What I'm looking for is,  the effect.