Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

Hi Geo. Thanks for the clarification on your video. I will watch out for further videos from you.
You do seem to get a fairly substantial effect with the earth ground connection you are using, that is for sure.
All the best...

[Void]

... This demonstration is only of any use as a party trick.

Hi Hoppy. You have already agreed with me previously that no video alone could ever be sufficient
proof that some device is really self running or that some apparent OU effect shown in a video is really as it
appears to be without any tricks or errors or oversight. Then why pretend that any 'over unity' related video
shown anywhere could actually ever satisfy you if they only included this or that or something else to the video?
That is just plain silly man.

I think any reasonable person realizes that anything shown in a video alone in relation to 'over unity' could
possibly be faked somehow, so obviously when people look at anything shown in such videos it is
already a given that something could be faked. We therefore have to each use our own judgement in
trying to determine if there might be something of value in any given video based on various other
things. However, as we have already discussed, for someone to suggest that something is *definitely* fake
or, to put it another way, "only of any use as a party trick", without any evidence to back up such a statement, 
is of course just as much of a stretch as it would be for someone to watch such a video and declare that the effect shown
is definitely real and accurate even though they had never ever confirmed such an effect by some other means.

In regards to subject areas such as this, there will always be true believers who declare things to be true without
any real evidence or proof, and there will always be true believers who declare things to be false without any real
evidence or proof. Both sides are really no different from each other. They are all people who operate mainly at the level
of belief rather than with demonstrable evidence and facts.

I personally think people should take what is shown in any OU related videos as 'possibilities', and then it is up to each individual
to try to determine if there might be something there that is potentially worth looking into further on their own or as a group effort or not.
Clearly no one is twisting anyone's arm here to spend time experimenting to see if they can prove some effect or other to
them self, so, I don't see any problems.

I think there is nothing wrong at all with true skepticism rather than someone just promoting their beliefs under the
guise of skepticism, and nothing wrong at all with people offering constructive criticism if it truly is offered with
constructive intention and is backed up with something reasonable. People declaring things to be definitely 'fake' or 'party tricks'
without any evidence to back up such statements is not of any practical use beyond possibly making the people who make such
unsubstantiated statements feel more comfortable with their beliefs. However, I think this equally applies to people who make definitive
statements about some effect definitely being related to 'radiant energy' or 'the aether' or 'quantum energy' etc. without
offering anything at all to back up up such assumptions. Why is it not just OK to admit that we don't know something for certain or that
we don't understand something if we don't really know or understand something? The answer is of course that beliefs help shape a stable
world view for an individual while admission that we just don't know about or don't understand something can be potentially unsettling and destabilizing.

Good luck to all who are open minded enough to genuinely look for what might really be there regardless of
current widely held world views and personal beliefs and assumptions...

[Hoppy]

Hi Hoppy. You have already agreed with me previously that no video alone could ever be sufficient
proof that some device is really self running or that some apparent OU effect shown in a video is really as it
appears to be without any tricks or errors or oversight. Then why pretend that any 'over unity' related video
shown anywhere could actually ever satisfy you if they only included this or that or something else to the video?
That is just plain silly man.

Void,

I meant that the video as it is presented is only good for a party trick. I'm not implying its a fake because clearly, as we agree, there is no way of telling by what is shown. Perhaps a bad description on my part. 

[Hoppy]

Further test will be done with 24V car battery.

Thanks for the update Geo. I'm glad that you intend to continue tests using a battery. That is important.

[NickZ]

   Geo:
   Nice going!!!   
   You got it working like before the melt down. 
 
   Can you try a few more bulbs on the output, to see what happens.
   You've got two main frequency peaks, and they stay real steady at those individual frequencies, no matter what you do with your hand.
   Although your two main running frequency points don't seam to change, the amplitude of those peaks does. What you are seeing is how you affect the amplitude of one, or the other peak, but not their two different running frequencies. While, the sound of the device stays about the same. So, your sync between the various circuits is running real steady, on it's own.
   Probably the thing to do now, would to just tune it for the best running frequency, at maximum bulb brightness.
With out you personally interfering with the tuning, by being too close to the device. 
  Then allow it to do a burn-in test, to see what happens, and it if can run non-stop for hours, or overnight.
   
  I'm impressed with your Kacher circuit, and those long (wide white light) streamers that they give off. Unlike the purple or violet streamers, and weak streamer mine gives off.  I see that the light level at your bulbs is dependent on how much affect and gain the Kacher's secondary has on the induction circuit.  The more gain from the Kacher, the brighter the lights get.
 
  Can you post a diagram of you Kacher/Tesla coil, as you had done previously, but putting a value on ALL the Kacher circuit components, if you can.  Please.
   I'd like to replicate it, if possible.  As that is also the Ruslan earlier and simpler Kacher circuit design.
And I like simple...
And something that works... at least to the degree that you are showing on your video.
   Thank's,  Geo.