Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[PolaczekCebulaczek]

and there is an E field around this negative inductor, it's actually two E fields pointing at each other as I have found during my experiments, those fields are trying to induce out of phase current in secondary coil if present,(aren't stepanov transformer was some sort of weird out of phase mumbo jumbo configuration?) and of cource for best effect we should use thick insulation wire and HV psu so the fields have space to expand before they met each other.

[PolaczekCebulaczek]

Can I make a negative inductor from tesla pancake winding? and place another normal pancake coil on top of it and place both coils in between two metal plates charged with HV? would this make some tasty free energy sandwitch? I would also use mayonnaise for extra dielectric to prevent arcing from plates, yummy!

[lost_bro]

Let's take this concept a little further, theoretically speaking...

Ask yourself this question, "What is a negative inductor?"

For all practical purposes, I see a negative inductor as a capacitor.

Next, let's suppose we have a coil, that is nearly non-inductive, on the order of just a few nH or pH.
Now apply a high voltage field as described in the link above.
Would we effectively get a capacitor that is on the order of a few nF or pF?
By applying the voltage field, we just turned our inductor into a capacitor.
This opens the door to getting a parametric oscillator if the timing is done correctly.

Above is step one.

Step two.  Let's add a second coil of wire, but this time much more inductive.
Now we have an air-core transformer when no electric field is applied.
When we apply a high voltage field, any inductance is gone on our first coil--now turned into a capacitor.
If the inductance is gone, we no longer have a transformer.
With no transformer, there is no path for back EMF from load to source.

Sure seems reasonable to me (theoretically speaking of course), the grenade coil is
doing just as I have mentioned, with the Tesla secondary voltage field acting as the switch.

The next logical step is to see if we can test this "negative inductor" concept on an
actual grenade coil.  We need to know how much of a field to apply to get it to switch
from an inductor to a capacitor.  If this can be done with real numbers, all the rest is
just engineering.

Good day Dog-One

Interesting, both Nelson and MagPwr just recently spoke of parametric oscillators /transformers.

Could this be just another co-incidence?

take care, peace
lost_bro

[conico]

Hi Conico,
I have also some dangerous spikes on the source/drain side of the IRFP260M wich allows 240V..
What i see on my Ruslan7 setup is maybe someone like Verpies, Jeg or Lost_bro reconizes?

Duting driving only the 3 turn coil connected to the inductor i really have nice clean rectangle waveforms.
As soon when i increase the load by using the 30/45/60 turn secundairy connected to the kacher part the source/drain spike occur at the rising edge of the output wave.
It is a very sharp puls.
Also one of the fets has a significant higer puls then the other.
I use 10nf/100ohm snubber which stays cool normally, un fortenately it isn't capable in absorbing the high puls.

Since i reorientated my drivers close to the gates no treshold spikes occur on the gates anymore.
Also i have no significant HV interference little fuzzy resonance at the high level gatesignals...as this seems to be normal.
So it all improved a lot since last posted pictures. But it seems, altough Conico shows no pictures he has the same problem.

Can someone give some suggestions what to do about it?

Now there are no spikes at all in my device , I have two snubbers, one on the PCB , 22 nF 100 Ohm and diode UF4007 and another snubber placed on the yoke 220 nF and 10 Ohm 10W resistor between drains of mosfets and midle 12+12 turns that mins (+) of power supply.
That strong snubber change the frequency on inductor and on wima cap . Now i'll change the 3-4 turns on yoke to 6-8 turns for having the same resonant frequency.

[Reiyuki]

Interesting, both Nelson and MagPwr just recently spoke of parametric oscillators /transformers.
Could this be just another co-incidence?
lost_bro

Indeed, even Tito brought up parametric amplifiers/oscillators, but nobody talks about which parameter is being modified.

I think the variable parameter is permeability.

Applying an HV gradient to a running circuit with current flowing in both directions causes those fast-running currents to run outside the copper, like a skin effect.   I think you could then collect the result electrostatically.

This change in 'virtual permeability' would only show up in circuits with currents running in opposition (non-inductive coils, bifilars, opposed/bucking coils, etc) and it would be proportional to the external static field voltage.


I wonder if we're getting warmer?