Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 130 Guests are viewing this topic.

endlessoceans

Quote from: Tomtech29 on December 27, 2016, 10:39:56 AM
Hi.
I'd like to bring an entirely different part of my earlier thoughts issue that bothered me for some time A):
-why the direction of the wave on the photograph is different than assumed?
-how is it that something makes the acceleration of the magnetic field?
and in the end what is the reason that the coil having a solid substrate acts as a spring.
(Feedback magnetic field) not a high voltage or radiant energy , I was wondering what are taps on the primary coil Tesla affect modulations
So sometimes I think myself that it can be and so in the case of Ruslan device .:D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdwVR-DnF-I


1)  The direction is different because after the initial pulse there is no immediate decay in oscillations but rather expansions.  I have built a circuit of my own that is incredibly efficient (looks over efficient but I am reluctant to state such a thing at this point) and such a waveform I have seen over and over.  The initial problem was that it is so close to unity that the magnetic 'blowback' causes the entire circuit to choke on input and cease ringing.  The key is to bleed some of the energy off so that it can keep flowing and echoing smoothly

2)  Flow is simple.  Stop trying to send two rivers of water against each other in the same pipe.  All conventional circuits will never reach even close to unity.  When you wire it correctly, it is virtually room temperature superconductivity.  A good quality current reading instrument will actually show 4 times the AC than input DC and the DC itself will be massively high.  At first you will think the circuit is grossly inefficient but what has happened is that the current flow is so fast and so 'free' that it is circulating at massive speed through the oscillator and back through the source.   My batteries at the source will read higher than the resting voltage and when the circuit stops, voltage will not have depleted accordin to the current reading.  I have tested this with supercapacitors also rather than batteries and the results are the same.

3)  Coil is solid substrate and static.  Magnetic field is a dynamic gel that can be compressed and behave like a spring.  Key is to manipulate the field so as to not waste the fluid.

AlienGrey

Quote from: conico on December 19, 2016, 11:01:40 AM
I believe this is the Ruslan's diagram with two transistors 2SC5200 and a mosfet IRFP 260, both on the radiator:
Please note in this circuit, P1091 Conoco circuit!  after going through this schematic I have noticed a problem that needs some attention notice the HEF4046 device is a 12 volt CMOS device HEF4046 driven from 12 volt in this circuit.
It feeds ic7 a 74HC14 5volt device. The two devices will need some sort of interface driver, none inverting buffering, bear this in mind before switching on.

AG

lost_bro

Quote from: AlienGrey on December 26, 2016, 06:24:29 PM
Nick (frequency) you need to talk to Stella on that one, but I don't want quote his research if you go back to when he started he showed a good web site you missed (in french)  but did you look at Staker's site on his research on the grenade ? you need to.

And Nick It's pointless just to keep building stuff if it doesn't work, we need to know what we are doing, and even then who knows. PS want to buy some junk ? or do you want to collect it ;) joke!

If we look at the grenade coil, we are told to cut off 37.5 meters of wire, we then wind 1/4 ccw and 1/4 cw then we wind 1/8 ccw and 1/8cw and then 1/16 cw and 1/16 ccw  any on familiar with that ? so that's a total of 28.125 meters with a remainder of 4.685 meters ;) now that is a different wave length to what 37,5 would be, so what did every one do as I don't remember any comments on this phenomena !


Regards AG

Good day AG

Usually the electrical length of a transmission line *ends* where is it *terminated*, so after winding the 28...meters, the remaining X... meters are still a valid part of the transmission line *until* an abrupt impedance change is encountered, ie; terminated.  So this remaining length is use to connect the Grenade coil to the Yoke, etc. maintaining the total of 37.5m physical length and corresponding lambda.
Does this sound correct?

take care, peace
lost_bro

AlienGrey

Quote from: lost_bro on December 27, 2016, 08:14:36 PM
Good day AG

Usually the electrical length of a transmission line *ends* where is it *terminated*, so after winding the 28...meters, the remaining X... meters are still a valid part of the transmission line *until* an abrupt impedance change is encountered, ie; terminated.  So this remaining length is use to connect the Grenade coil to the Yoke, etc. maintaining the total of 37.5m physical length and corresponding lambda.
Does this sound correct?

take care, peace
lost_bro
lost bro hi
i'm not to sure as it would detune our wave guide, note the grenade shape, but yes two things here we need to terminate our drive close to our wave guide and the other thing is we need to make our winding's  4 2 1 add up = 37.5 ForSakArgmt 37.5/7 = 5.357142857 meters per unit. So  our first 2 winding's would be1, 10.71428571 x2 = 21.42857142 ccw and the same back
our next 2 winding's ccw and cc would be 5.357142857 each way =10.71428571 total
and our last 2 winding's  2.678571429 each way = total of  5.357142857. add that up and it comes to 37.5 m in theory ;)

All i have done is spread out 'wave' over the 7 sections, 14 with back and fourth and divided our wave accordingly, happy wingdings
PS add a bit for connecting or included it in your calculations. note any load you put on this device will heat it up. keep a bucket of water handy ;)      ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Jeg

Quote from: lost_bro on December 27, 2016, 08:14:36 PM
Good day AG

Usually the electrical length of a transmission line *ends* where is it *terminated*, so after winding the 28...meters, the remaining X... meters are still a valid part of the transmission line *until* an abrupt impedance change is encountered, ie; terminated.  So this remaining length is use to connect the Grenade coil to the Yoke, etc. maintaining the total of 37.5m physical length and corresponding lambda.
Does this sound correct?

take care, peace
lost_bro

Right on point! Yoke's 28T sec, is connected straight to grenade and it is about 4 meters.

AG there shouldn't be any worries as Ruslan did the same. If you are intent to terminate your grenade with a diode before connecting it to the yoke, then grenade has to be 37.5m for the correct wavelength calculation as you said.