Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[stivep]

"magical"?  Tesla achieved this in 1896, some 12 yrs after the first PV (daytime) cell was created.
converting interstellar radiation (just above the visible spectrum) into electromotive force.

Problem I have with  your response is:
with accuracy  and sense .

1. Accuracy   
the condition or quality of being true, correct, or exact; freedom from error or defect; precision or exactness; correctness
I need from you if possible method and means of conversion, the procedure of conversion  where
a.form of energy used for conversion is specified
b. form of energy converted is specified

So far I do not even have  from you the discription about "end product"- ( b) ?

Electromotive force, also called emf is the voltage developed by any source of electrical energy such as a battery or dynamo. .
Force is not an energy.
Voltage is only indicator of potential difference  or   potential energy  but it is not not an energy.


In certain conditions  EMF could be a  general name for a _device:
A _device that supplies electrical energy when  it is s called electromotive force or emf. would be the one that  in this particular understanding of device  will-(Emfs) convert chemical, mechanical, and other forms of energy into electrical energy.^[3] The product of such a device is also known as emf.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromotive_force
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ad. 1b.

document :
The Interstellar Radiation Field - Springer
specifies many types of  radiation.

2.2 Radio-Frequency Integrated Radiation  - radio-frequency radiation comes from extragalactic sources,

2.2.1 Bremsstrahlung Radiation  -This is a kind of continuum radio radiation emitted by a plasma through free–free
transitions of H and He ions

2.2.2 Synchrotron Radiation (Magnetobremsstrahlung) -nonthermal radiation, emitted by relativistic electrons being
deflected by the magnetic field of the interstellar medium.

2.3 Cosmic Background Radiation
residual signal whose nature was unknown , a team of Princeton
University predicted that some radiation should be observed at that exact wave-
length, as a result of theoretical models for the formation of the Universe. This
radiation would essentially be the remnant of the Big Bang, the explosion that gave
birth to the Universe. According to this prediction, the radiation field would be
isotropic and would correspond to a blackbody microwave emission with temperature of around 2.7 K.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sense:
(to be clear and easy to understand: )
if 1a is not specified than 1b is not substantiated  and does not have  form  of understanding  designed and applied

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
conclusion;

-With all do respect my friend  information posted by you does not have format accessible  without heavy digging for additional pieces.
The best example  of  accessible post is my post.
a. all essential elements are listed
b. all essential elements have links  for accurate explanation and processing.

by that  your post  fails into  category of casual sounds made by need of   serving  casual purpose.
However  I find it interesting as my attention was focused on it  and I started to   approach it  from different perspectives ( also random and not specified)


Wesley

[AlienGrey]

Hi there fellow reprobates

If you go back on this tread you will find various lectures quoting stuff from the 1920'-1940's where Albert Einstein and Oppenheimer all said the same thing ' if I have in my hand a few drops of water' it's not the water but the space it occupies that contains enough energy to run some 'God' forsaken place like 'America' for a 'hell' of a long time !  space isn't filled with 'dark matter' it's dark energy. It's man will one day learn to harness that energy and run his machines from it, well that day has come an well gone by!

And the Egyptian's also said as above, so below! which is so very true!

Also if you look at this Video on 'Fourier' square waves they are made out of a bunch of sine wave harmonics, watch this video.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJpDFnRQw8s

Any one seen this ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dabJMBGMVqI


AG

[jbignes5]

 I understand Mags.

My point was this. Ok.. Lets take the example of Tesla condensing liquid oxygen out of gaseous oxygen.

It's the very same process. Condensing liquid Plasma out of gaseous Plasma. Since Plasma is in a less density in the environment we can condense Plasma from it. Fortunately the Plasma is voltage reactive meaning it condenses due to the intensified differential potentials of a system. There must be two different types of Plasma as well. One responding to positive and one responding to negative potentials. With a third type acting neutral or balanced. This neutral type is what conducts the other two Plasma's into action. Kinda like a roadway towards a higher or lower potential.

Learning how to condense the Plasma from the environment towards your system and allowing the Plasma to flow into that system to a sink of the Plasma can net you way more out then in. Not because we are creating energy but we are creating an imbalance, like a hill creates in elevation to a lower plane. The sink in this case is either a real ground (Plasma deficient) or a virtual ground which is coupled to the ground through the gaseous Plasma in between the ground and virtual ground plate. The virtual system can be used when no sink is available, which forms a loop with the inlet plate to return Plasma to the source which is condensed.

The problem I see with these setups is that they don't include an in or out when used in closed systems. Although there might be a bit cycling from portions of the circuits they tend to be like Tesla describes as a loss of pressure in one or many portions of said circuit.

If we start looking at this as a pressure type of system with clear ins, outs and shielded portions to retain pressure where needed we might be able to break the loss barrier and get more out then in due to the nature of plasma being an excellent electrical transmitter, in effect magnifying the output via concentrating and focusing the Plasma as it flows through the systems. Almost like the way we focus or concentrate light through a lens. It would appear like we have created more power but in reality all we have done is condensed the energy as it flows through the device and induce the intensity into another coil wrapped around the primary bifilar coil.

We all know that if you can increase the speed of something it increases the energy of that something right? Well instead of letting a coil use self induction we design it in a way that allows that self induction to aid the first impulse into the bifilar coil. This negates the current dampening that a solenoid exhibits and through a second pass through the bifilar coil aids the speed of the previous impulse and adds to the second impulse as well. There we should be able to see an apparent gain that is two fold if it is timed right as the impulse flows to the ground weather real or virtual.

I really think this is what Tesla and TK were trying to show.

As for the Dally system, I have not really tried to figure it out because we still have not nailed down the Tesla or TK examples. We should.. To truly understand any of these systems we must understand the originating systems first. I think most are stumbling around trying to fall on the discovery. I would rather study the examples we already have and figure it out from there.

Listen I know I am rather harsh sometimes in responses. I don't mean to be. It is only that the responses seem to be dismissive before any exploration of what I present or others for that mater is proven, including Tesla's ideas. Our current system is not capable of figuring this out. There is a good chunk that is missing in that system. Like the missing Maxwell equations. They are missing for a reason. Greed. The main reasoning behind this is the old saying "There is no free lunch". Yet everything we see runs on with no plugs or seemingly apparent connection to get it's energy from in nature. If matter is as Tesla describes then all energy is outside of matter and matter sinks it to draw it in due to the displacement of the medium it floats in.

[stivep]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juALh0UqoWk

Wesley

[Bronepoezd]

I enclose their developments in the field of free energy.