Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 146 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: NickZ on March 09, 2017, 09:36:52 PM
Makes me wonder what other errors that schematic may have, also.
Don't think about them as errors - just another way to do things.

Quote from: NickZ on March 09, 2017, 09:36:52 PM
I am using 3 watt 460 ohm resistors in the 9 and 10 pins, looks like some other diagrams are showing 10 ohm resistors, instead. And I am also using 1k to ground, after the 460 ohm resistors.
So you can move these 460Ω resistors in place of the 1K resistors to ground and connect pins 9 & 10 of the TL494 directly to the TC44220s. 
These resistors to ground can go as low as 48Ω but it is very important that these resistors are not wirewound or inductive in any way.

Whoever was designing this circuit was trying to unnecessarily make a protective voltage divider for the TC4420 inputs without realizing that these inputs can easily tolerate any input voltage between -5V and VDD ...and more.

The DC CHARACTERISTICS Table of the TC4220 clearly states:
"Input Voltage Range     VIN  –5   —  VDD+0.3    V"

The resistors to ground are needed as pull-downs by the transistors inside the TL494 acting as emitter followers. 
These transistors can handle 250mA and with a 12V supply the 460Ω resistors to ground will allow only 26mA to flow, so there is no problem with making them 460Ω ...hell, they could even go as low as 48Ω and the TL494 could handle them.

AlienGrey


Ed morbus


AlienGrey

Quote from: Ed morbus on March 10, 2017, 03:12:43 PM
Is this real
to be honest i don't think those two mess about with BS!

Did you notice the type of EHT TX they were using 'no embedded EHT rect.
but i haven't tried it my self but i have seen florescent tubes planted end on under pillons in a field and they were lit up, it was quite amusing i can tell you that, but i wouldn't want to live under them my self.

If your interested i suggest you try it but please make another tread ;)

NickZ

Quote from: Hoppy on March 09, 2017, 07:13:19 AM
Nick,

I've never had a problem using pin4 DTC for duty control. Try linking out the 12K resistor. You should get up to 45% with a fairly linear response between 0V and around 3.35V with 20% duty at the middle of the voltage range. There is a better way of doing it as Verpies suggests but to avoid messy changes to your board, I suggest you try and get the pin 4 duty control working properly.

   That did the trick alright, and now the duty cycle controller does work, by removing the 12k resistor. To a degree.
A 10k pot would possibly work even better, like apecore is using.
   I will also change the 1000 ohm resistor to something like a 100 ohm, to ground, and run the TLs output direct to the fet drivers,  as Verpies suggested,  tomorrow.