Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 69 Guests are viewing this topic.

ariovaldo

Quote from: forest on May 30, 2013, 03:13:05 PM

It depends on what you count as "using old junk parts" . Those parts are sometimes much better then most IGBT nowadays , for example old russian transistors. Two of them can pass 23A easily without worry about spikes.... but for a short time period.....
ANyway, eliminating transistor or mosfet is a perfect idea.


Using commutator in low voltage/high current or spark gap in high voltage/low current?

Grumage

Quote from: forest on May 30, 2013, 03:13:05 PM

It depends on what you count as "using old junk parts" . Those parts are sometimes much better then most IGBT nowadays , for example old russian transistors. Two of them can pass 23A easily without worry about spikes.... but for a short time period.....
ANyway, eliminating transistor or mosfet is a perfect idea.

Dear Forest.

A great suggestion, it has always made me wonder how Tesla could create high frequency pulses without semiconductors. I assume he commutated using lots of brass segments? Of course such a device would be quite bulky. Are there any photo's surviving?

Cheers Grum.

NickZ

  Well, to not use transistor switching, I guess that it would take coils, and capacitors, and maybe diodes. Where the pulse is controlled by the frequency of the coils and capacitor circuit  combination. I'm sure this has been tried many different times, in many different ways, previously. But, Not easy to do and obtain the wanted results,  or is it?

forest

Yes, not easy. I'm still in the realm of mosfet or transistor switching :-( trying to make a device, but I'm sure the only perfect solution is that which do not use active semiconductors except for a start only. Our ancestors didn't have semiconductors yet they run ou devices and all signs points to the theory that ancient civilisations had some very advanced generators...

verpies

Quote from: Grumage on May 30, 2013, 12:41:56 PM
The Dally device uses a Co axial conductor. A lot like a very long cable which has a capacitance. You slam on to it a high voltage. This rapidly charges the cable and suddenly there is a backlash of energy.
What caused it? Is there something special happening? Or was this phenomenon that Tesla witnessed made into his famous Tesla coil? And nothing more than that?
Obviously if yes is the answer to the above question, then we are on a "Goose chase"!! And any energy gain seen must be due to some other means, the most likely of which is NMR.
That coaxial cable coil is strange. 
First of all, according to conventional science, the pulse should be totally contained inside the coax cable and have no influence outside of it.  However Itsu has demonstrated that the pulse somehow influences stuff inside that coax-coil.  The only conventional explanation is the AB effect or a coax leakage (IMO unlikely at this magnitude). That explains only the manifestations of the pulse outside of the coax cable, but it does not explain the "backlash of energy" picked up by other coils outside.

If it is NMR than it requires a static magnetic field perpendicular to those nanopulses (for spin polarization), and most importantly - a gain medium (e.g. an aluminum or a brass pipe or any kind of core). 
Does this device, that you are writing about, have these features?