Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

Nick and T-1000:  It has already been pointed out that since Daly most probably based his
setup on Kapanadze's early devices and possibly similar setups, that any discussion related
to Kapanadze/Daly/Akula/Ruslan setups and similar is on topic in this thread, just as it always has been.

Nick and T-1000, this is not your own personal thread for discussion of only what you
happen to feel like commenting on, on any particular day. This forum has great potential
if people would be friendly and respectful and work together and share their ideas and their experimental results, etc.
As long as the discussion here is related to practical discussions of Kapanadze/Daly/Akula/Ruslan type
devices and similar it has always been on topic in this thread, as everyone who has been around for
at least a few years knows quite well.

Instead I see people getting bent out of shape and having fits or attacking people just because someone expresses
an idea or view they don't happen to agree with, and a couple people here who think this is their own personal thread
and that no one else should be allowed to comment on anything except them. That's really too bad. So much potential wasted.

I will go back to working on my own. 
All the best...

[Hoppy]

Nick and T-1000:  It has already been pointed out that since Daly most probably based his
setup on Kapanadze's early devices and possibly similar setups, that any discussion related
to Kapanadze/Daly/Akula/Ruslan setups and similar is on topic in this thread, just as it always has been.

Nick and T-1000, this is not your own personal thread for discussion of only what you
happen to feel like commenting on, on any particular day. This forum has great potential
if people would be friendly and respectful and work together and share their ideas and their experimental results, etc.
As long as the discussion here is related to practical discussions of Kapanadze/Daly/Akula/Ruslan type
devices and similar it has always been on topic in this thread, as everyone who has been around for
at least a few years knows quite well.

Instead I see people getting bent out of shape and having fits or attacking people just because someone expresses
an idea or view they don't happen to agree with, and a couple people here who think this is their own personal thread
and that no one else should be allowed to comment on anything except them. That's really too bad. So much potential wasted.

I will go back to working on my own. 
All the best...

Agreed! This thread has always had a healthy following and at the top of the charts, so I see no good reason to change things. As far as Nick's build is concerned, some readers, including myself have bent over backwards helping Nick come to terms with electronics, so I think its a cheek for him to moan about those same people wishing to have other discussions on related devices, whether or not they are building. Rant over.

[itsu]

Come on guys, don't over-react, we need all the brain power available to crack this, please let the contributions flowing in this thread.



Ok  Nick,   

once again, here below the 5 steps we have to go through to calculate/build a proper snubber.
Steps 1 (1.98Mhz) and 2 (909Khz) are almost done, i only need to know the value you have put on to half the ringing frequency.
The correct capacitor we are going to use is 1/3th of that cap value.
Then we can continue with step 3


Procedure for Determining the Proper RC Values for the Snubber Circuit

1.Measure the frequency of the spike resonance. See Figure 3 for an example.   (= 1.98Mhz)

2.Add a shunt capacitor across the drain-source of the MOSFET (not the resistor, just the capacitor) and adjust the value of this capacitor
until the frequency of the spike resonance is reduced by a factor of two.    (cap value = ?)
The value of this resulting capacitor will be three times the value of the parasitic capacitance that is creating the voltage spikes. (cap value / 3 = ?)


3.Because the parasitic capacitance is known, the parasitic inductance can be determined using the formula: L = 1 / [(2πF)² x C]
where F = resonant frequency and C = parasitic capacitance

4.Now that both the parasitic capacitance and inductance areknown, the characteristic impedance of the resonance can be determined
using the following formula: Z = SQRT(L/C) where L = parasitic inductance and C = parasitic capacitance

5.The resistor in the RC snubber circuit should be sized to the value of the characteristic impedance, and the capacitor should be sized
between four and ten times the parasitic capacitance.
The use of larger capacitors slightly reduces the voltage overshoot at the expense of greater power dissipation and less inverter efficiency.



Itsu

[Belfior]

I have successfully disregarded all posts that do not interest me. I hope you all can do the same. I do read every post, because I do not want to miss any good ideas. I haven't yet built my version of the device, because my parts are en route from China. I need the pulse source at least.

There has to be building obviously, but there are really only 3 options for succeeding. There is a schematic, that works. You somehow get lucky after people have tried that for 100 years already. You understand how it works and you build it how every you want with what ever parts you want.

First option is no good. We have 7 years worth of posts on this thread to prove there is no such schematic
Second option needs government funding and I want in if you get it
Third option needs more talking.

[Hoppy]

There has to be building obviously, but there are really only 3 options for succeeding. There is a schematic, that works. You somehow get lucky after people have tried that for 100 years already. You understand how it works and you build it how every you want with what ever parts you want.

Hi Belfior,

I think you have summed it up about right. Welcome to the most popular thread on the forum.