Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

     @Qwert:
     Yes, all those problems that we are discussing here were already known and their solutions were also.
  It was not Tesla at fault, but the greedy people in control of energy, even to this day.
   I'm not saying that he knew everything, but,  enough to give the world free energy, and more.
   Real freedom is what he and everyone else lacks. If you think you're free to do as you like, try to live without money.  Anyway, I know how boring this must all be to some, the well to do, mostly.

[NickZ]

  You are the one that crossed the line when you say that Tesla was Very Wrong, and your opinion without any proof is what is right.   
  When you mention energy from "nothing" it implies what you know about it.

  Quote from Verpies:
"It is wrong to conclude, that the Magnacoaster device converts vacuum to energy even if it functions as advertised". 
   "What is "it" ?
If "it" means converting vacuum to energy, then yes, I don't think that's possible."
 
  You are the one crossing lines, as well as disrupting the direction and progress of a free energy forum.
   Like I said, you would not acknowledge it, even if you had it in your hands, and watched it work.

[verpies]

You are the one that crossed the line when you say that Tesla was Very Wrong,

Oh yes, Tesla was very wrong about the structure of matter, but stating that not an Ad Hominem remark.
He did not even realize that charges are quantized and that electrons exist.  I posted a link to that in this message, and that's part of my proof.
Criticizing of Tesla's conclusions is not the same criticizing his character.  In fact, there is nothing wrong in that - it is the result of critical thinking on my part that is devoid of hero-worship (a known killer of objectivity).

and your opinion without any proof is what is right.   

I posted links to Tesla's denial of basic structure of matter and links to videos that prove him wrong in this message.
When you mention energy from "nothing" it implies what you know about it. 

You are the one crossing lines.

No, because I am attacking wrong ideas and you are attacking a person.

[NickZ]

  So, I am the one attacking a person???
 
   Making statements like this:

  "Oh yes, Tesla was very wrong about the structure of matter",

   You are proving that the electron exists.  You mean,  like proving the Big Bang exists?   Right!

   Guys, sorry for this debate.  TK also had the same argument.  There are many books that "prove" the idea of harvesting energy from the surrounding "Sea of energy".  To those that will comprehend what is being stated.

[verpies]

When you mention energy from "nothing" it implies what you know about it.

I find energy from nothing/vacuum illogical and unsupported by any kind of empirical evidence. 

And since the lack of evidence for existence does not constitute an evidence for non-existence, it is impossible to prove existential negative. Thus the burden of proof lays on the proponent of existence. 
That means you, if you are a proponent of energy from nothing/vacuum.

You are the one crossing lines, as well as disrupting the direction and progress of a free energy forum.

I am not the one making Ad Hominem remarks.  Arguing against an illogical idea is not disruptive nor unscientific. In fact it leads to progress by avoiding wasting resources on dead-ends.
Also, free-energy is not synonymous with energy from nothing or vacuum, thus I am not negating the purpose of this forum.

Like I said, you would not acknowledge it, even if you had it in your hands, and watched it work.

That's an example of line-crossing Ad Hominem remark that purports to predict my close mindedness in light of experimental evidence.