Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

Belfior

Quote from: apecore on February 25, 2018, 03:46:36 PM

Maybe some suggestions what the reason is why yhis extra inside aluminium foil is giving this more output gain?  btw,..  suing a coil inside gives the same result...  the foil has the highest increase due it probally has the highest square cm?


Hmm well maybe it assists with the magnetic flux? Just like a ferrous core does. Aluminium is said to be nonmagnetic, but it reacts to magnetic fields.

Could you do one test for me? Put foil over the coils. Cover them totally and leave maybe 1cm space between the foil and coils. Then put 2 diodes from the foil to a cap. One letting negative pulses through and the other positive pulses. Do you get a charge on the cap?

Diode can be fixed like this guy is doing

https://youtu.be/WJUfj53geBo?t=90

stivep

Quote from: Belfior on February 25, 2018, 04:09:39 PM

So you first charge the dielectric by rubbing it with fur or cloth (wool?). Then you place the metal plate over it.
Electrostatic field charges the bottom of the metal plate positive and top part negative.
Then you lift the plate and "ground" the top part by touching it with your finger. Now you got positive charge on the plate and you can zap things with it.

I want to try this with capacitors. Create a static field and place a cap in it. Lift the cap up from one leg with fingers. Then measure voltage in it
Yes, that is perfectly understandable ,
Proffesor Lewin  gave  this puzzle to  his students :
You charge  Leyden jar,
( two electrodes - on the inside and outside of a glass jar)
Than you remove outer and inner cap  with your  hands  so now you have three pieces the two copper caps and  the glass jar
Next you assemble  three pieces together and apparently the charge was conserved and you can  discharge the  capacitor.
I was trying to puzzle Dr Roy with it today.
His response was right on the money
"It depends what is your body charge." he said.
So the charge  in the right sequence  of disassembly and re assembly  of     Leyden jar was transferred to your body and than back to the capacitor plate.
however "your body" must be insulated from the ground  with right  type of shoes .

Wesley



AlienGrey

Quote from: apecore on February 25, 2018, 03:46:36 PM


Hi everybody...  Hi T1000,

I did some test with a kacher and a grenade after i looked at your posted vids from Ruslan and Alexey..

In my attached vid you can see i am driving a simple kacher circuit with my varable power supply which is supplied by 12V from a car batterie.
I do not interupt the kacher,..  its continously running
The bulb is a 20W (or maybe a 40W // 240V type), connected to 18uF caps and a full bridge rectifier.

In normal setup.. only with antenna connected to the kacher secundairy there is almost no power generated,... (also not frequenty depended)
In my case i put a aluminium foil inside the grenade tube and connected to the antenna (with series cap 1nf)...  the series cap does not make a lot difference)
As you can see i get the highest output at the bulb when poth legs of the grenade are connected toone side of the bridge rectifier.... the other leg is connected to the kacher transistors emittor.
It also does not matter when only one leg of the grenade is connected to the bridge....
Groundline connection is also not a mayor player in the game either..

Maybe some suggestions what the reason is why yhis extra inside aluminium foil is giving this more output gain?  btw,..  suing a coil inside gives the same result...  the foil has the highest increase due it probally has the highest square cm?


https://youtu.be/7fUZhLX8tu0

Please give me your comments

Greetings
Nice scope shot of a sine wave, is that from the kacher ? if it is i's just a DC-DC . The idea is to cause stress in the electrons
suppose i'm in a car i start and i stop I keep doing that with the kangaroo petrol but each time i do it with an inductor LC in the right place at the right time i get free electrons, well thats the idea but the pulse is very narrow like a flash! so i'm told. 

SolarLab

Quote from: stivep on February 23, 2018, 10:31:56 PM
I do appreciate your comment but  language you use is completely 100% convoluted.
(extremely complex and difficult to follow.)

I  try to process ...... whatever you have had in mind while you wrote the text in question
So questions  I have:

*** At this point I believe most of your questions have been answered by other contributors.
*** Your remaining quandaries and comments, unfortunately I am unable to address. SL


Summary:
I do appreciate your contribution to this forum  however if a content will be  found "out of  merits"
It may  spark objections of the fine public here.
By that  Stefan may be ask to remove it  including  an author account.
"I hope it is not the case"
If you feel  more comfortable to use different language please operate in this language and  I will be happy to make  any sense  out of it.
Если вы чувствуете себя более комфортно использовать другой язык пожалуйста   я буду рад сделать из этого какой-то смысл.

Wesley

Also; thank you for your kind "language" offer; and threat - err, sorry, I mean advice!   8)

However, viewing the bulk of recent posts it appears many others did NOT have any problems
interpreting the information regarding the importance of understanding electrophoretic charging;
in fact you yourself seem to have gained some important knowledge.

As a follow-on; please review the "Single Wire Transmission" information given a few posts back.
It (possibly) relates directly to "extracting" conventional current from the system, as developed by
Ruslan, Kapanadze, et. al.

And, as you know, I do not participate in unproductive discussion nor engage in pissing contests!

Have a nice day...

FIN

T-1000

Quote from: apecore on February 25, 2018, 03:46:36 PM
Hi everybody...  Hi T1000,

I did some test with a kacher and a grenade after i looked at your posted vids from Ruslan and Alexey..


Hello,

Nice to see you tried to do experiment. :)

Just also for a bulb instead of connecting directly, can you attach 0.5-1mm spark gap or thyristor circuit in series to bulb?
So the capacitors would be allowed to charge up to 1kV+. And the requireremt to keep capacitors charged then half-discharged may be achieved.
What I am interested in that case is how frequently the capacitors would give charge to the load with minimal power input. If it is at least 50 times per second, the async transformer can be made and attached to the load part of circuit.

In regards to foil, Sergey Alexeew also used it and he also used winding instead of foil in his circuits. It is capacitive plate in regads to ground and is helping when air ionization happen.

Cheers!