Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 92 Guests are viewing this topic.

stivep

Quote from: arhitrade on November 15, 2018, 02:24:00 AM
Transformer of transverse-longitudinal waves - Kapanadze's secret?
The  original Russian version of the article  is more accurate and less confusing.
The copy that is translated into English article, uses generic translating method .
Clear and  logically  easy to analyze method is essential  to us.
Thank you very much for your contribution
This is the link to  russian version http://gorchilin.com/articles/free/TTLW?
I'm not able to translate it now, to busy with other duties.
but I'll keep it in mind and definitely analyze it.
I would like to express my deep appreciation to Russian and Ukrainian speaking researchers.

Оригинальная русская версия статьи более точная и менее запутанная.
Копия, переведенная на английский язык, использует общий метод перевода.
Для нас очень важен простой и понятный для анализа метод  перевода.
Большое спасибо за ваш вклад
Я не могу перевести его сейчас, (занят другими обязанностями)
но я буду держать это в виду и определенно анализировать . Я хотел бы выразить мою глубокую признательность
российским исследователям и тем, кто говорит по-украински.

Wesley
Уэсли США
 

SolarLab

F.Y.I.

Wesley - the articles don't seem that confusing or inaccurate - IMHO anyway. The entire site is excellent! 
You do have an excellent valid point - machine translations can alter the meaning significantly - see my CAUTION 
found at the end.  

But, try this if you seem to find it a problem:  Re: translation of Gorchilin's pages...  http://gorchilin.com/

Articles:  http://gorchilin.com/articles/    [select language flag]

Install "ImTranslator" into Monzilla Firefox; may also work with Chrome;
uses Google, Microsoft  and Translate translators [select-able or compare]:
http://about.imtranslator.net/add-ons/
Has translation comparison, a dictionary, voice and back translation; all free.

Note: sometimes Microsoft's translator is better for technical stuff.

Try this: Use the Gorchilin web page in Ukrainian (blue over yellow flag);
Select ImTranslation [R Click drop-down] "Translate this page to English;"

For example, translated words like "sheer wave" in Russian are actually
translated to "transversal wave" when going from Ukrainian to English
using ImTranslate. 

Also, the Yandex translator found on the web page [flags] does a pretty
good job as well plus the formulas are correctly presented, links are
direct [book marks] and it's no hassle. But be cautious; auto translations can
change entire meanings - see below.

As a side note; the date of the article is in the upper RH corner of the page.
And - Donate if you can - he is doing a great job! Providing a site cost money.

FIN 

ATTENTION:  Just noticed some of the animated graphs might not populate
their default values correctly, therefore the text descriptions might appear confusing. 

To check this, here's a quick example:
- go to this page   http://gorchilin.com/articles/free/magnetic?lang=en 
then the animated graph link "example 1"  ( in blue therefore = link ). 
Note the "link address" [in link address bar of browser] shown below -

http://gorchilin.com/calculator/longline?L=0.5&Q=100&g=100&g=0&g=56&g=0&g=0&ph=90&ph=90&ph=90&ph=90&ph=90&lang=en 

Where L=0.5& Q=100& g=100& and so forth - these are the values that the sliders 
should be set to; L is wavelength (0.5 or 1/2), Q is the system Q factor, g is the gain
for each slider [harmonic] and ph is the phase for each slider [harmonic]. Set the sliders accordingly (approx) 
and the example animations will make a lot more sense!   

However a summary of the overall objective is here: http://gorchilin.com/articles/free/magnetic_P?lang=en 

CAUTION: Machine translations can alter the meaning of all papers and web sites significantly! For example:
translate this page  http://gorchilin.com/articles/free/magnetic_P?  using both Yandex RU=>EN and UK=EN 
plus the ImTranslator method above. 

Note the sentence below figure 5. -   

"By the way, this dissipates the myth that standing waves carry energy"  versus 
"By the way, this dispels the myth that standing waves do not transfer energy" 

A very significant difference in meanings - as Wesley points out; be very vigilant!   

BTW, ImTranslate Compare [Google, Microsoft and Translate] seems to have gotten this one correct. Check everything however! 
==== 

onepower

Magnetic fields can be at odds with our perception and reason sometimes.

For example I have two magnets with the same poles facing upwards and they repel because like poles repel one another. Go further and we could say that lines of flux pointing in the same direction supposedly moving from North to South repel which is the reason the magnets repel. It seems intuitive that parallel lines of flux pointing in the same direction always repel.

This would explain why the continuous parallel lines of flux diverge outward from the North pole however it would seem to be at odds as to why the same parallel lines of flux would converge at the South pole. If they are the same continuous parallel lines of flux moving from N to S which must always repel then why do they converge at the South pole?.

We could dispense with the poles and lines of flux as a form of notation and imagine a uniform gradient of force however it always comes full circle back to some spooky action at a distance. It would seem to be a form of circular reasoning until we apply something in the way of natural law. That is whenever two opposite conditions converge or in this case forms of notation(+-), (N-S) they negate each others condition summing to zero. Which gives some credibility to the notion of a dipole, di meaning two, poles separated by a zero plane from which the poles or conditions diverge and converge.

In my opinion the alternative is some spooky action at a distance which seems to contradict itself at every turn which is never a good proposition.

Bat1Robin2

Each individual magnetic dipole molecule is acting as a small pump that spins and moves ether out the north pole at the same instantly it creates a vacuum of ether at the south pole. The similarity to water being pumped is different because ether is a super-fluid with no mass and feels no resistance so it maintains its rotating river streams (flux lines) which will form a 3d torroid without external interference., The high pressure north end finds its way back naturally to low pressure south end, So its not really north attracted to south it is simple equalization effect. There is no way to generate power by putting a water wheel in a steady state ether stream because its a super-fluid. The ether is momentum energy hidden in its super-fluid characteristic, The  reason you cant harvest energy from a super-fluid flywheel should be obvious. Thats why static magnetic field are not good energy sources. The ether streams can only move other dipole molecules as they try to align with the passing rivers. This is where we harvest energy but in a steady stream river there is no changes. So the magnetic source needs to oscillate to make any energy transferable. Each transformer core will have limitation in frequency range this can efficiently happen. Photons are a pressure wave of the ether which is a coaxial manifestation and its presents only indicates energy leaving in all directions. Ether has a circular superfluid manifestation that makes the atoms, thats why all magnetic fields spin to begin with. So a magnet is pumping energy in a torroid circle but uses no power to do it because its a superfluid with no mass. Only the changes to a superfluid flywheel can be harvested as energy. So what we have to do is have the dipoles of the molecule tilt away within at random directions and every so often come into alignment and make a strong magnet field source. AT the same time they have to do this at a rate that is compatible with the core it is within.  Then keep an exciter circuit running (tesla coil) that will keep this source dipole movements in the core fluctuating while we harvest energy from the result. So it seems to me there is some preconditioning necessary to any core that will be used in an overunity device. When we get this figured out perhaps like writing a song on a magnetic tape then transformer core should begin to run cold when it works. When i see the nuts in a circle that all support each other magnetic field i think of a domino effect that could cause a rotation within the core. The tricky part is the yoke core itself in my opinion.

AlienGrey


So have you got your device working?  well, you might want to take this idea on board or at least look into it.

Have you ever come across a pistol shrimp it can produce a punch that can shatter a clam or a crabs shell with a single blow
and boil the water in a bubble that's produced in the action with heat that's said to be hotter than the surface of the sun in the vortex

It's the collapse within the vortex in the speed of the action perhaps it's we need to apply and then there is the blue star produced by the acoustics
in a fluid, the simplest ideas are always the best.

http://www.physicscentral.com/explore/action/sound.cfm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXK2G2AzMTU