Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[lancaIV]

Struth why do they make it apear so complicated ?

1.00 is 1 amp
0.100 100 ma
0.010 10 ma
0.000 1 ma

0.000,1 = 100 micro amps                 = 10-3
0.000,000, 100 nano amps                = 10-6
0.000,000,000, 1 100 pico ampos       = 10-9

somple ain it

0,000 1 ma
0,000,1 = 100 micro amps                     Simple error ! Before and/ or behind the= 1 Kommata
                                                                     ONLY ONE GLOBAL SYNTAX ALLOWED !

[F6FLT]

...
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/a7/7e/ef/a4f6ce53545d68/US20140159845A1.pdf 
...

Quote from http://levitronics.blogspot.com/, levitronics inc being the assignee of the patent :
"However, Ampère had demonstrated that magnetic force is transverse to the force on moving charges that created the magnetic force, and Faraday had shown that inductive force (emf) on a secondary charge is offset from the accelerating force on the primary charge. Magnetic force and inductive force therefore adhere to the ad infinitum energy principle which Helmholtz cited, not his mistaken interpretation."

It's a misunderstanding that we read regularly. The force is perpendicular to the trajectory, so it does not perform any work in the referential of the observer who sees the B field and the moving load at the constant speed v.

If we do the analysis in the reference frame of the moving charge, where its velocity is therefore zero, then the charge sees an electric field E=qxB and it is subjected to the Coulomb force F=q.E. This force really accelerates it since the charge is deviated from its inertial trajectory which was at rest. So energy is being expended.

We must not forget a crucial point: energy depends on the reference frame!
When you are inside a car at 100 km/h, the car has no kinetic energy in relation to you, you can't slow it down, you can't get work out of its speed.
If you're on the road in front of a car coming at 100 km/h, you'll feel it, and its work too, believe me!
So who says if there is energy or not? Where is the kinetic energy? No where. It's just a question of viewpoint, a question of relativity. Same thing for charges and fields, there is no more energy available to the observer but there is more energy in the system constituted by the source field and the moving charge.

[lancaIV]

"So energy is being expended "
C.O.P. from the "gas-system-body": Sun ? Body efficiency ?
Nobody is perfect, neither the Sun

[SolarLab]

Bingo!

*** vis viva noun  vis vi·va | \-ˈvīvə\       plural    vires vivae\-īˌvē \
Definition of vis viva : the force of a moving body calculated as the product of its mass and the square of
its velocity : twice the kinetic energy   ***

Pulsed:  - steady rest state (in the car) - rapid acceleration [dv/dt] - steady at speed state - rapid deceleration [dv/dt] - steady rest state.

Square of the velocity - dv/dt   --- (in the car) steady state, rest or at speed = OK, otherwise (dv/dt) maybe not!     

I ignore I (amps - magnetic) since it follows V (delta potential difference); but, C and L are how these are manipulated...     
Or Not!      

First paper (11.2)... etc...  https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/64e4/8cc38d68decf787fda1519db1f51f25a13a2.pdf 

[lancaIV]

SolarLab,  when you have the dtv-Baende Atlas1,2 "Physik" you can see it :
car from the left and Truck from the right: collision,  collider calculation from kinetic forces, vector/scalar( deformation), and the " summa sumarum" , weight and velocity dependant               

Oldies,  but Goldies ( my from 1987 , well studied)
https://www.zvab.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=22921719287&searchurl=hl%3Don%26tn%3Ddtv%2Batlas%2Bphysik%26sortby%3D20
https://www.zvab.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=30146226025&searchurl=hl%3Don%26tn%3Ddtv%2Batlas%2Bphysik%26sortby%3D20