Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Jeg]

Hi AG and all
Lets say we have a transformer with a primary and a secondary. We spend an amount of energy X=1 across the input. We take at the output an amount of 0.9 due to losses. What if we add both of the prim. and sec. energies over the same load. Won't this be an OU action? We spend 1 and we have 1.9 across the load...
Just wondering..

[AlienGrey]

Hi AG and all
Let's say we have a transformer with a primary and a secondary. We spend an amount of energy X=1 across the input. We take at the output an amount of 0.9 due to losses. What if we add both of the prim. and sec. energies over the same load. Won't this be an OU action? We spend 1 and we have 1.9 across the load...
Just wondering..

Only 'if' we could walk on water, , if you remove the input power the power at the secondary will also disappear.
In truth, most of the windings in the device are not tuned and are saturated in 'lose' so I doubt you would get anywhere near a 0.9 efficiency.

[Jeg]

I doubt you would get anywhere near a 0.9 efficiency.

This is not quite true. At high power in iron transformers you can go at high efficiency levels close to 90%. But also by imposition I managed to go close to 1. See again my push pull device in my channel. Anyway. I have invented a new method for measurements. I'll call it CapIn/CapOut technique. I use two identical caps one for input and one for output. I charge the input cap from a battery and I discharge it through the circuit I am measuring. After I measure the voltage level of my output cap and here it is. If the output cap is at higher potential than the used input potential then something is going on. If not then I just move on without any doubts.

     

[forest]

Yes, every transformer is theoretically 200% efficient.

[Jeg]

Yes, every transformer is theoretically 200% efficient.

If you make work with your primary charges instead of wasting them perhaps it is the basis behind everything here.