Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

   Good point AG. 
   Maybe the reason that mostly Russians and Slavs are the ones that own the FE tech, like Tesla. Is due to ancient knowledge that they once have had, but that has been lost or unknown to the rest of humanity.
   Bosnia has the largest man made pyramid in the world. All pyramids are placed over geomagnetic vortexial power spots, having flowing water underneath. The Bosnian pyramid is the biggest and greatest free energy structure in all the world.
   I am a hybrid decendant of that race of beings. And Geo, as well. May explain our longings for such technologies, and purpose in life, and our inability to ignore our true excitement and chosen paths. He is like a brother, to me, therefore my concern for his success and happiness.
   NickZ
    PS. Void, good to hear. Me too.

[Void]

For your amusement.
A quick and rough video demo of two sparkgaps in series, with sparkgap 2
showing a significant current gain compared to Sparkgap 1.
Sparkgap 1 has a considerably lower current than sparkgap 2, but sparkgap 1
is feeding sparkgap 2 in series. Why does sparkgap 2 show a much stronger discharge current
than sparkgap 1 which is feeding sparkgap 2?
Does this current gain in sparkgap 2 represent an energy gain?

"Demo of sparkgaps in series showing a current gain"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmU99fH9gzo

Sorry for the somewhat blurry video.
My camera doesn't take very sharp videos in lower light.
Also I made this video quite quickly so it is maybe a bit shaky.
I am not really a video person, but I thought this might be of some interest to some folks out there. 

[Raycathode]

Well ancient magic is it  never to be seen again 

So it woundn't be anything to do with the speed of light would it ?

so wjat is the speed light travels at ? it wouldn't be 386,000 miles per second would it ?

so how fast is it traveling to clear 1 meter ?

So 1 ft would be 900 Mhz so how can we use this phenomina ?

[gyulasun]

Hi Void,

May I chime in with these observations and comments in your video : 

- I can see different air gap (SG) sizes: SG1 is roughly 2x wider than SG2 
- The current via SG1 feeds only partially SG2, the other part comes from the discharge of C1 
- SG1 is directly fed from the HV flyback driver output which I think has much higher internal resistance than capacitor C1 driving SG2 (even if this driving current comes partially from C1) 

After evaluating these, your questions could probably be answered more correctly.   

You mention the SG2 is dischaging at a peak voltage not too much less than the voltage supplied by the HV flyback generator:  I assume you measured this with a HV probe?   
If you have another capacitor (let's label it C2) with the same value C1 has, then this C2 capacitor could drive SG1 and the HV flyback generator could charge up this C2 directly via also a series HV diode.  This way two identical C capacitors with equal internal resistances could drive SG1 and SG2 and the gap sizes could also be trimmed and tested.  This way the energy levels in C1 and C2 would be known with more certainty and confront them with spark gap colours and intensities. 

As a smaller circuit change, a capacitor C2 (identical to C1) could be connected directly across the output of the HV flyback generator in the same setup as you show in the video.  This C2 could reduce the internal resistance of the generator. 

Thanks for showing your efforts.

Gyula

[Void]

Hi Void,

May I chime in with these observations and comments in your video : 

- I can see different air gap (SG) sizes: SG1 is roughly 2x wider than SG2 
- The current via SG1 feeds only partially SG2, the other part comes from the discharge of C1 
- SG1 is directly fed from the HV flyback driver output which I think has much higher internal resistance than capacitor C1 driving SG2 (even if this driving current comes partially from C1) 

After evaluating these, your questions could probably be answered more correctly.   

You mention the SG2 is dischaging at a peak voltage not too much less than the voltage supplied by the HV flyback generator:  I assume you measured this with a HV probe?   
If you have another capacitor (let's label it C2) with the same value C1 has, then this C2 capacitor could drive SG1 and the HV flyback generator could charge up this C2 directly via also a series HV diode.  This way two identical C capacitors with equal internal resistances could drive SG1 and SG2 and the gap sizes could also be trimmed and tested.  This way the energy levels in C1 and C2 would be known with more certainty and confront them with spark gap colours and intensities. 

As a smaller circuit change, a capacitor C2 (identical to C1) could be connected directly across the output of the HV flyback generator in the same setup as you show in the video.  This C2 could reduce the internal resistance of the generator. 

Thanks for showing your efforts.

Gyula

Hi Gyula,

I wasn't too concerned about getting the sparkgap widths exactly the same, because
that isn't too critical for what I was demonstrating. If Sparkgap 2 is wider, you will still see the same effect.
It will just lower the discharge frequency of Sparkgap 2 further, but the same 'current gain' effect will be seen.
The current of Sparkgap 1 feeds primarily the capacitor C1 which discharges through Sparkgap 2 when the
capacitor reaches a high enough charge voltage to jump Sparkgap 2. All of this charge current is coming through Sparkgap 1.

I actually explained in my video why the current pulse magnitude in sparkgap 2 is a lot stronger.
It is because it is discharging at a considerably lower frequency.
The current pulses are much higher magnitude, but there are longer time gaps
between each discharge than there are in Sparkgap 1, due to Sparkgap 2 discharging at a lower frequency. 

To answer the question I posed in my video, no, there isn't any energy gain indicated by this effect
for the reason I have explained. The effect shown is due to lowering the discharge frequency of Sparkgap 2.

All the best...