Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

  I'm not sure that I understand what is being mentioned in the other thread, concerning the lightning aspect. I'd have to see it to believe it, first. As I don't see any lightning going on, on a sunny day, or it's ability to be stored in capacitors for future use.
  Maybe I missed the point, as I also don't see any connection to the power lines outside TK's house, either.
So, I'm still believing what Tk, Daly, Stepanov, Akula and others have shown and mentioned, although I don't really care too much what the source is, so long as it works.
 
  I'm still intending to make the Royer circuit(s), like some guys are showing, but need to get some more new transistors (by the kilo). I'm still not sure which circuit is the best to make, yet. I don't want to waste more time making plain inverter devices, as I already have a good working emergency inverter devices, so the feed-back, self running aspect is still my main concern for now.

[Hoppy]

  I'm not sure that I understand what is being mentioned in the other thread, concerning the lightning aspect. I'd have to see it to believe it, first. As I don't see any lightning going on, on a sunny day, or it's ability to be stored in capacitors for future use.
  Maybe I missed the point, as I also don't see any connection to the power lines outside TK's house, either.
So, I'm still believing what Tk, Daly, Stepanov, Akula and others have shown and mentioned, although I don't really care too much what the source is, so long as it works.
 
  I'm still intending to make the Royer circuit(s), like some guys are showing, but need to get some more new transistors (by the kilo). I'm still not sure which circuit is the best to make, yet. I don't want to waste more time making plain inverter devices, as I already have a good working emergency inverter devices, so the feed-back, self running aspect is still my main concern for now.

I agree about the lightning unlikely being the source of energy but I think the point that Ansis is making is that there is a 'long line' involved and that this is somehow 'capturing' environmental energy. As I mentioned, this makes some sense as TK did not wish to demo his devices in bad weather. Clearly in bad weather, lightning hitting the 'long line' could 'smoke' TK's device. As for you not seeing any connection to power lines - of course not - he is not likely to give anyone a glimpse of that, so the jury is still out as to whether he is capturing grid energy in some manner.

[Khwartz]

Hi GeoFusion!

For precised and accutare measurement of amps, you do not need sofisticate tools, just a good resistance in series with your out-put. By measuring voltage, and by Ohm relation I = U/R, you get the amps (you take 1 ohm and you have direct reading without calculation ) ; what ever HF waves around, especially in a Faraday cage.

For the out put, you do not need sofisticate and expensive equipment too!. As Laurent/Woopy said too: just need a bulb reference light with its normal voltage and compare the brightness of your output light bulbs with the brighness of the reference bulb. A luxmeter could be a must, but you don't really need it if the brigthnesses are enough similar, I mean of the same magnitude while in same time you would have a very high ratio out-put power under input power.

This last point is all needs to be done: having for example 1 amp under 24 V in entry, so 24 W, and one or several 100 W light bulbs AS bright than a 100 W grid powered. Theoretically, even with a single 50 W you could prove OU. Then, if you make this you will have prouved undoubitably the OU, and any other measurements, like scop, are just for understanding and betterments. IMHO.

Cheers.

[forest]

Generating lightning is unlikely done by simple accumulation of charges....First those charges should be produced

[Hoppy]

Hi GeoFusion!

For precised and accutare measurement of amps, you do not need sofisticate tools, just a good resistance in series with your out-put. By measuring voltage, and by Ohm relation I = U/R, you get the amps (you take 1 ohm and you have direct reading without calculation ) ; what ever HF waves around, especially in a Faraday cage.

For the out put, you do not need sofisticate and expensive equipment too!. As Laurent/Woopy said too: just need a bulb reference light with its normal voltage and compare the brightness of your output light bulbs with the brighness of the reference bulb. A luxmeter could be a must, but you don't really need it if the brigthnesses are enough similar, I mean of the same magnitude while in same time you would have a very high ratio out-put power under input power.

This last point is all needs to be done: having for example 1 amp under 24 V in entry, so 24 W, and one or several 100 W light bulbs AS bright than a 100 W grid powered. Theoretically, even with a single 50 W you could prove OU. Then, if you make this you will have prouved undoubitably the OU, and any other measurements, like scop, are just for understanding and betterments. IMHO.

Cheers.

Thanks for your comments on the measurement issue. A light meter can be purchased cheaply on e-bay, so there should be no excuse for not getting a reasonably reliable power consumption comparison with the same lamp load when grid powered. IMO its wishful thinking to expect a device to self-run without being in a genuine OU condition, so lets all get a little more scientific and start reporting light level measurements when reporting experimental results using lamp loads.