Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[magpwr]

hi itsu and TinselKoala,


I did some research recently related to nanosecond pulser and longitudinal wave while waiting for some  stuff related to pcb creation at this moment in order to resume my China Don smith replication experiment.

The word "nanosecond or nanosecond pulser" seems to appear in Akula,Ruslan device which they have mentioned base on translation  and if i decode the word correctly for Don smith replication in China as found in their forum where they mentioned "pulse"/duty cycle need to be narrow using the only  signal generator PWM i/c:3825 for frequecy 220khz...230khz.

Try doing search on "nanosecond pulser" which is related to generating hv.

This part will only be boring for those in forum whom have no interest in electronic experiment especially for those who only do speculation work--

Longitudinal wave is also another topic of interest which i learned more from Page 277 from July 2014 edition of PJKbook.pdf
This is where i am referred to a demonstration of actual longitudinal wave experiment conducted years ago.

Transverse & Longitudinal Electric Waves - Eric Dollard & Tom Brown 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BnCUBKgnnc


By applying the Longitudinal  experiment in my virtual lab using the same component as used in their experiment which consist of 1mH and 0.47uf(Mica capacitors)
I am able to light 120volts 100watt bulb output using around 60watt of power.There is no bullshit here with the virtual scope via 0.1 ohms resistor and set to 100mV/div.

I can't use higher than 60volts for driving signal else i would blow the 100watt bulb design to run around 120volt. "Do think about this experiment 100watt output power for 60watt input."
I have attached a video of my virtual experiment.Please ignore the bulb pulsing as emulated in milliseconds run-time in reality you will not even see bulb filament pulsing even at 50 or 60hz.   

I'm sure this would be of interest for Wesley,T-1000,verpies and others whom like to dig deeper into how things work.
------------------------------------

Related to Akula device which previously i had no interest in due to some details related to scope shot which was missing previously in order to carry out the ill-fated experiment.
I ponder if anyone whom blindly assembled Akula circuit which consist of dual TL494 device of his have even bothered or attempted to replicate or emulate similar signal or waveform as what was seen in his recent scope video which shows 100khz with around 500us...2ms delay between pulse as attached "scopeshot" for reference.One of TL494 is running at lower frequency roughly 500hz to 2khz.1/500hz=2ms.
This is extracted from Akula youtube video nanosecond secret posted by someone in one of the 3 ou topic few days back(Can't seems to find bookmark link when you need them)-

[Void]

NickZ, I am wondering which MOSFETs are you using in your ZVS driver?

[NickZ]

  Itsu:
  The idea is to obtain the strongest highest best magnetic pulses from the yoke core, as that is really it's only purpose, and not for directly lighting the bulbs, as we are doing now for testing purposes. For later combining this induction crt with your  HV nano pulser circuit, to try to replicate the Akula/Ruslan self running devices.
  At least that's my plan... may not be yours, though.

   I can't read your scope's voltages clearly, but, it looks like you are lighting the two 220v 60 watt bulbs on 35 volts, or so. IF, this is correct, then you will need to obtain a higher output from the yoke output coil.
  If you are going to be using the 220v bulbs, and not 110v bulbs like I am, then possibly 220v or higher output voltages are needed. But, as I'm not using those bulbs, the two circuits not be the same, when using different bulbs as the load.
 
   My suggestion then, if you can't find the 110v bulbs, is to buy two or more 220v 100w, or better, 200 watt bulbs, as Akula is using. As the different higher wattage bulbs do make a big difference on the circuit draw, as the higher the wattage of the bulbs, the higher draw and output you'll see from the yoke circuit.
Unless you are satisfied with low lighting of the two 60 watt bulbs, so as to keep your circuit running cooler. If so, I don't understand the point? 
  I can only suggest what has worked for me...

   I would not worry about how hot the fets get for now, I just light the bulbs for a short time, only.  As that will change later when combining this induction heater crt with nano pulser crt, to heterodyne the frequencies. IF that is the idea, which I'm hoping is the real purpose, and not just to make an inverter.

   Notice that my yoke is using thicker wire for the primary, and the next gauge smaller size for the secondary output coil.  The gap for placing the future 3 turn or so second output coil, as seen on Akula/Ruslan/Geo type yoke coils, may be more important than you may be aware of. Better to replicate it the way that they have it, but of course it's up to you.

  I'm showing this picture below of the smaller first yoke core that Akula used, which DID NOT WORK. As an example of just how sensitive these devices can be.

[NickZ]

  Void:
   I'm using the exact Mazilli induction heater crt, as is shown in the diagram below.
  The only difference is my additional tuning caps on both the yoke input side as well as on the yoke output coil, to tune for and obtain the best running frequency.
I still don't have, and haven't been able find, any more of the right value tuning caps. So, my yoke circuit is not optimized, yet.

[Hoppy]

 
   My suggestion then, if you can't find the 110v bulbs, is to buy two or more 220v 100w, or better, 200 watt bulbs, as Akula is using. As the different higher wattage bulbs do make a big difference on the circuit draw, as the higher the wattage of the bulbs, the higher draw and output you'll see from the yoke circuit.
Unless you are satisfied with low lighting of the two 60 watt bulbs, so as to keep your circuit running cooler. If so, I don't understand the point? 
  I can only suggest what has worked for me...

Nick,

Why are you so keen on initially using higher powered bulbs, which simply just draw a higher current from the supply resulting in hotter mosfets? Surely, the initial objective is to self-loop, irrespective of loading. Even a genuine LED self-runner would be worldwide breaking news! There's no evidence whatsoever that 100W bulbs are better option than 60W bulbs towards achieving a genuine self-runner. In fact, there is no evidence whatsoever that a genuine self-runner has ever been built!