Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 258 Guests are viewing this topic.

NickZ

  Well, that's the question...  My guess is the there are better resonant peaks, and we have only touched on the lower efficiency peaks. If at all.
  When you see the lay out on a spectrum analyzer, you see that there are several peaks, with some peaks at much higher frequency than some of the other peaks.  But, as Itsu noted, he could not go there. Which may be the reason why we don't see any improvement.
  Looks to me that a stable running frequency has a very narrow band width.  Much less than 100khz+/_.

   How does one do that using a 9v battery? As has been replicated, by Kapanadze, Ruslan, Vasmus, SR, and others?
That's what still needs to be replicated, understood, and verified by us.

Hoppy

Quote from: NickZ on June 29, 2015, 12:20:46 PM
  Well, that's the question...  My guess is the there are better resonant peaks, and we have only touched on the lower efficiency peaks. If at all.
  When you see the lay out on a spectrum analyzer, you see that there are several peaks. But, as Itsu noted, he could not go there.

Well, its time for a drink (without the cigar), now that we've hit the 600 page mark.  :)

NickZ

  Alright then, I'll start right away, but with the cigar.
  We still have many more pages to go. At least we made it this far.
  Maybe it takes lots of Vodka, and cigarettes, and that's why we haven't hit on any results, yet. That, just has to be it...

T-1000

For PLL or no PLL there's reason. Without it you have to tune on exact load and ground, air ionization conditions then with that changing the resonant frequency shifts and system goes out of tune.
Ruslan always use PLL for making tuning much easier.
Also the main thing there's not electronics but know-how which does not exist in conventional terms. And that is the road for everyone to find out for getting power amplification effect in place with peaces of information already in place. In the end of the day this is multi trillions dolar knowledge which can halt burning of fossil fuels on planet scale...

NickZ

 Yet, it seams that the PLL is not the only way to go. But, we need to find out if Ruslan is still needing to use it, or not.  I understand the implications. Since Tomtech had mentioned that he didn't see a PLL on Ruslan's newly shown boards,  we're going to still need further verification.
As the components can't really be read from the video images, so we still don't know for sure.
  Hopefully, Ruslan will make a schematic, and further explain tuning on that particular device.