Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[skywalker66]

Resonance of what?
The primary winding and the associated capacitor is always in LC resonance in the Mazzilli oscillator circuit, so you must mean something else.

No. I meant exactly what you understand.

[NickZ]

  skywalker:
  If you notice on the picture below, the 275 v, 0.47uf capacitor is soldered right to the thick white primary wires in my earlier version of Geo's circuit. I've also added more caps in parallel to that one, with no increase in lumins. The output of that circuit is the exactly the same as in my newer circuit showing the cap on the crocks, both circuits are about 35 volts.  The output to the bulbs increases in lumins by about 20% if I remove ALL caps.

  GeoFusion: when adding a smaller 3/4 inch iron powder choke, in series to the 1 inch iron powder choke, the output goes up by a couple of volts. The smaller 3/4 inch choke gets warm after a while. But the bigger choke stays cold, even when running by itself only. Just thought to mention that.

[Grumage]

Dear Verpies, GeoFusion, Nick and all.

I have uploaded the latest tests on the Split core saga!! 

And I think I have missed a vital part!!?? Voltage seen on channel 1 of the Fluke. With regard to what is seen across the CSR's??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glx91BNg_Tc

I am sure you will let me know!! 

Cheers Grum.

PS. At 6.39 with the core fully attracted TP 1 has 100 V. I did a retest!!

[verpies]

And I think I have missed a vital part!!?? Voltage seen on channel 1 of the Fluke. With regard to what is seen across the CSR's??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glx91BNg_Tc

That would be nice but a bit premature.  For this to be meaningful, you'd need to see the phase difference between the voltage across the winding and current flowing through the winding.

The non-sinusoidal current waveform appearing when the core halves are brought close together, suggests ferromagnetic saturation.
However, your CSRs are wirewound and inductive.  Because of this they cannot be trusted to develop a voltage across them that is proportional to the current flowing through them  !!!
For example at one point you show that PDC 2.8V is developed across these CSRs.  With non-inductive 0.1Ω CSRs, that would mean that peak 28A is flowing through them.  28A in a PDC sine wave is equivalent to 17.8A DC average because of this.
Yet your DC ammeter, at the input of your power supply, is showing around 3A average, without any transformers in between, so there is a large discrepancy already.  Maybe it is a symmetrical AC sinewave, which has zero DC average, but I cannot see where the zero on your Y-axis is.

Thanks for clearing it up with your attraction/repulsion DC test, that your split core transformer squeals the loudest in the mode illustrated by Fig.6a and Fig.6b. (of course this driving circuit never energizes both primary windings at the same time )

A like your new wattbox.  Calibration with known DC voltage and current makes me a happy pappy.

[NickZ]

   I've connected a different yoke to the same Royer oscillator.  This other yoke is the one that I wound before for my version of the original Akula device. And, this core does ring, where the other one did not, as least not that I could hear.  I can stop the yoke  from ringing by placing snake egg shaped magnetite magnets on the yoke, with out affecting the output, maybe even improving it slightly.
But, this Akula type yoke lights a 100 watt bulb, and also two more 50 watt bulbs, so three bulbs, in total.  Not bright, but it lights 200 watts worth of bulbs.  Adding more capacitors to the primary coil output other than a single .47uF does nothing, or lowers the output brightness. Even when lighting the 3 bulbs. 
I just did this test above, to see how it compares to the Geo type yoke core.
The Geo wound yoke core give brighter light, does not ring, but will not light the 100 watt bulbs, as is. Tomorrow I'll add more windings to both the primary as well as the secondary of the Geo wound core, to tune it, and make more tests.