Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Grumage]

Is that a measurement with the piezos pressed together or with the ferrite core between them?

Dear Verpies.

That is what was seen across the ends of one Ferrite half. Drive Piezo on one flat face pickup on other flat face.

I also noted that by applying a slight pressure to the Piezo's the delay deceased slightly!! And the received amplitude increased accordingly.

Cheers Grum.

[verpies]

That is what was seen across the ends of one Ferrite half. Drive Piezo on one flat face pickup on other flat face.

Better press the piezos between two ferrite halves but don't muffle them with your hands.

Anyway, I still unhappy with this waveform.  At your receiving piezo I expect a flatline and then suddenly a sharp rising edge of the received pulse.  Now, at your transmitting piezo (the rectangular waveform) you appear to have PRF=13.5kHz (74µs period) and the duty cycle of 73% ( 54µs/20µs : on/off (active high) ). 
This is way too high - the transmitting PRF should be 100Hz~1kHz and the duty cycle should be as low as you can set it.

[Khwartz]

Especially when using Load Controlled Oscillators (such as the Mazzilli circuit)

If you say so, dear Verpies, I pleased to believe you! Cause I have near no clue in electronics, only in electricity and energetics. But as I read the posts here from the experiments, really looks that the solenoid aspect of the light bulb filaments need to be care of in the calculations of optimum resonance frequencies.

What looks to me howsome in Selfonlypath technology, is the "selftriging" system which when use avoid any need of calculation to find the right frequencies (if I have well understood his vids).

Cheers.

[ARMCORTEX]

For myself and everybody, I will find a cheap solution , sine amplifier for flyback and cheap frequency counter to see where high point is. Perhaps theres a way to make the mazilli as a useable experimental oscillator with an ADC 12 bit, 12 relays and a carefully chosen capacitor range. Save ourselves a couple thousand dollars.

Akula and old scientists have some amazing gear, but you can go without those, all thats needed is a scope.

In the mean time, can anybody answer me the question of my last post about the motor with the little girl.

[verpies]

For myself and everybody, I will find a cheap solution, sine amplifier for flyback and cheap frequency counter...

Analog power amplifiers already exist. They are even available even as single integrated circuits.  For example the EL2009 which is a 35W analog amplifier with 1Ω output impedance capable of driving inductors directly from DC to 90MHz. 
See other amplifier datasheets attached below the schematics:

A high power digital power amplifier can also be easily constructed.  See the schematics attached below:

Perhaps theres a way to make the Mazzilli as a usable experimental oscillator with an ADC 12 bit, 12 relays and a carefully chosen capacitor range.

Notice that a power oscillator is something very  different than a power amplifier.
The Mazzilli circuit is a power oscillator where the transformer and the load is a part of the oscillator, while a system consisting of an independent oscillator feeding a power amplifier, drives the load independently of its properties, regardless whether the load "wants" to oscillate that way or not.
In other words the former method is a conforming resonant oscillation and the latter method is a forced oscillation of the load.

Yes, you could use a cheap LPC1313 with 12 MOSFETS, 12relays and a ladder of 12 binary weighed capacitors to make a  Mazzill oscillator that is frequency stable down to the 1 LSB precision if you trim the caps precisely, but that would not be easy - especially the trimmed HV caps and the relays. 
Not to mention the quantization errors and the switching transients associated with the clickety-clack array of relays.

Maybe a better approach would be a large variable capacitor made with some PWM method or variable inductor made with a saturable reactor?