Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Khwartz]

Message for Hoppy and Verpies.

I know guies your knowledge, skills and good equipment for experimentations and check the logic of a circuit.

May I present you both the following schematic for checking what the academic theories would give theoretically about the values obtained?

The purpose of this circuit is to test the simplest reduction of checking if we can have overunity just by fully using BEFM and resonances.

This test-circuit would fonction in only 3 times (and not more!).

Indeed, if we can acheive o.u. in this sequence then it is just about to repeate it but by focusing on only these 3 times we sightly simplify the tests.

So, this should work like this:

TIME 0:

Ci, the capacitor which will be use as power input, is disconnected of the inner circuit. (We use only capacitors here because of the obvious simplicity and fiability of the measurements of energy storing in these very simple components.) It is charged with as hight voltage as possible.

Cp, primary capacitor, and Cs, secondary capacitor, are totaly empty. They are chosen to maximalize the resonance with the coils Ls and Lp.

TIME 1:

Ci, is connected to the inner circuit as briefly as possible.

Cp, is disconnected and Cs, start to collect some energy in the first rush of current in the secondary circuit (current only "positive" direction.)



TIME 2:

Ci, is disconnected as soon as the BEFM in the primary circuit start to take place.

Cp, is connected same time and start to collect BEFM energy. Cs, continue to collect energy by the second rush of current in the secondary circuit (current only "negative" direction.)

Cp and Cs remain connected during the necessarely following alternative changes of directions of the current until no more oscillation.

FINAL CHECKING:

We check the lost of energy in Ci: deltaWi; the energy stored in Cs, WCs; the energy stored in Cp, WCp. If: WCs + WCp > deltaWi we have overunity.

What do you think? What would tell the chiffers based on our ordinary academic theories? And could you try this if you think it is worthy to counter-check the chiffers with the values we could then obtain in experimentation?

(If you follow me on this test, we could open a new thread about...).

Cheers.

[ARMCORTEX]

@ T-1000

I have looked, your friends (Inogda1 ?) have nothing to show for the claimed working 3 phase TPU. A barely lit lightbulb in the middle of a scupture is the only video.

@ geofusion

Why dont you just re-assemble the toroid and ship it to T-1000 or stivep, he will test it properly then send it back to you.

[verpies]

The main mistake there is to go away into ferroacoustic resonance instead of understanding how to make BEMF work for you in resonance for large power output without affecting power input as GeoFusion has.

At least there are well documented cases of NAR and there is no evidence of defeating the Lenz law so far.
"BEMF not affecting the input' = breaking the Lenz law.

[verpies]

Yes he did show it working normally.  So why replicate it exactly when there is nothing special about it?

That's the question that always needs to be asked.
What makes it more special than a common transformer from the energy/power point of view?

[verpies]

May I present you both the following schematic for checking what the academic theories would give theoretically about the values obtained?

But where is the schematic with the capacitors, inductors and switches?