Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

  Hoppy:
  Since you have the Mazzili circuit working, perhaps you can show us how well it works lighting some higher wattage bulbs with it. A video would be good, although some pics would do as well. That would be the best advice that you can give.
  I can also PM you my address in Costa Rica, if you would like to send me a letter with two of those 15v, 5 watt Zener diodes, and maybe a couple of those IRF 260N transistors, if you can find them in your area, as I can't.
   I have some of the transistor shaped fast switching diodes (like Igor uses), maybe those would be better than the regular diode bridge, or the regular diodes, for looping the circuit.

  Geo: Did you get your caps and other component parts needed for the feed-back path?  Have you been in contact with Igor? Sorry to be such a pest about the looping aspect.
  Maybe the space brothers can help, to make the best self-running circuit. As you seam to have some telepathic abilities and can "talk" to them once a month, or so.
  Please remember to show a clear close up picture of your Mazzili oscillator, so that a proper replication can be made of it. As just the diagram of it is not really enough to go on. Igor's recent Royer/Mazzili circuit diagram will also do, as well.
  Thanks,
               NickZ

[forest]

                                                        ?

a.king21  Instead of pulley I would simply use a quiver shaft and DC permanent magnet motor drived by a pulses with recovery.
I bet easy cake for a good mechanic

[Grumage]

a.king21  Instead of pulley I would simply use a quiver shaft and DC permanent magnet motor drived by a pulses with recovery.
I bet easy cake for a good mechanic

Dear forest.

You have an interesting idea but I have been thinking about this for a very long time !! These are just some ideas/and thought provoking for others...

Could it work because the motor driving the alternator is an AC device ?? The rotoverter springs to mind. I think that there would be all sorts of differing phase angles going on !! Another point that is missed is that a conventional AC motor runs at slip speed. That is a few RPM's slower than the synchronous speed of the alternator.  Here in the uk we have 50 Hz so a single phase alternator would need to be driven at 3000 RPM. This would mean a gear up from the drive to the alternator.

Putting a lot of earlier research and reading of various topics a "Loose" drive seems appropriate thus almost mechanically separating the two elements, driver and driven.

If you study GeoFusion's schematic you should have noticed that he has used a combination of "solid" and " flexible" wiring, chance?? I don't think so !! 

Well that's enough for now, cheers Grum. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UJZ9hDQnyA&feature=player_embedded            Perhaps this might also provide a clue !!

[d3x0r]

Dear forest.

You have an interesting idea but I have been thinking about this for a very long time !! These are just some ideas/and thought provoking for others...

Could it work because the motor driving the alternator is an AC device ?? The rotoverter springs to mind. I think that there would be all sorts of differing phase angles going on !! Another point that is missed is that a conventional AC motor runs at slip speed. That is a few RPM's slower than the synchronous speed of the alternator.  Here in the uk we have 50 Hz so a single phase alternator would need to be driven at 3000 RPM. This would mean a gear up from the drive to the alternator.

Putting a lot of earlier research and reading of various topics a "Loose" drive seems appropriate thus almost mechanically separating the two elements, driver and driven.

Was thinking about a mechanical analog of this mazzilli... obviously the LC tank is equivalent to a flywheel... but power is stored there... but when you take power off of this inertial wheel... which equivalently could be done with a centrifugal clutch (when the wheel is up to speed, contact is made with another wheel to transfer some out...


But this is all 'power' there isn't a separation of 'volts' and 'amps' to compare analogously. well I guess that amps is sort of related to the speed and voltage is the inertia; but in this system those are equivalent... a higher 'inductance' would be a heavier wheel... so transferring  1:1 ratio of mass wheel the target wheel will get brought up to some speed in some amount of time... a lighter wheel will be faster quicker (more current), but have less inertia (flat conversion from current to force)... a heavier target wheel will get up to speed less quick (less current), but will have more(?)... will have a larger than 1:1 ratio inertia... but that must put 1:1 at a defined loss point


but then I guess; current through a coil has a direct relation to its magnetic field, which is a direct relation to potential voltage.


So I also guess the first flywheel is driven by a 'water drop' where a unit of water falls on the outer rim to impart motion... the mass of this at a radius results in an acceleration; but is then limited to the rate at which the water is moving in the first place...


so then, is there a relation between where the mass is on the wheel (even distribution/outer mostly(wagon wheel)/outer only(cylininder) vs the inductance of a coil? and the geometry of the coil?


are these relationships real?  Or are they a byproduct of having electricity's definition based in mechanical observations in the first place?


--
Tried to make a notation of current flows, but there's 75% forward and only 25% backward... so...
then I found the setting (again) to show minimum peak power.  So pwoer is really 1.2 in for 4x and 2 2.4 out... (one 2.4 out for every 1.2 input... )
would be nice if there was an integral function... so it showed the sum under the curve for power instead of instantaneous power (falstad simulator, scopes, etc)

[NickZ]

  What is meant by flex wire, to be used on Geo's Royer/flyback crt. Is it the braided iron or copper wire?