Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[d3x0r]

Mazzili circuit :


According to my reading of the circuit, there is an event which takes place called "resonant rise"    and this ultimately causes the circuit to blow.
All efforts therefore seem to be made to suppress the resonant rise in order to sustain the circuit.
May I point out that "resonant rise" is just what Tesla was aiming for and did achieve in the Colorado Springs experiments.
Therefore it would be appropriate to USE this "resonant rise" and find another way to protect the transistors.


I think  members' time would be better spent on fixing the resonant rise matter rather than designing circuits which measure power.

Only place I found mention of resonant-rise : http://adammunich.com/zvs-driver/
ahh; and here... http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1266&context=theses


but ya, that's the increase in stored power in that circuit... so your mosfets must withstand the target voltage, but so must the diodes; if you use 1N4002(100V) or 1N4003 (200V) if you have a 10X storage increase, then if you use 80V you need to use at least a 1N4006 (800V) but that will be only marginal.

Other than having to make sure your levee has a high enough containing wall... I don't see an issue with 'resonant rise'... ?

[a.king21]

Resonant Rise is here


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/coloradonotes/coloradonotes.htm[/size]

[Magluvin]

Mazzili circuit :


According to my reading of the circuit, there is an event which takes place called "resonant rise"    and this ultimately causes the circuit to blow.
All efforts therefore seem to be made to suppress the resonant rise in order to sustain the circuit.
May I point out that "resonant rise" is just what Tesla was aiming for and did achieve in the Colorado Springs experiments.
Therefore it would be appropriate to USE this "resonant rise" and find another way to protect the transistors.


I think  members' time would be better spent on fixing the resonant rise matter rather than designing circuits which measure power.

I read something someone said over at OUR I believe. It was a while back. They said you cant take from a resonant circuit directly. even if the oscillation does rise on its own, it cant be taken from 'continuously'    He said, you start the oscillation, then let it rise on its own, then take from that. And if you dont take it all, no restarting necessary.

I wish I knew how to make a self rising resonant circuit.    But as to what to do with it, it makes perfect sense.

Mags

[verpies]

According to my reading of the circuit, there is an event which takes place called "resonant rise"    and this ultimately causes the circuit to blow.

It's nothing unusual. It is the manner in which LC circuits accumulate AC energy. 
They only accumulate what is put into them - "resonant rise" does not create any additional energy.  It can destroy electronic components if the Q of the LC tank is high and the accumulated AC energy circulating in the LC tank is not dissipated by an LCR resistance or siphoned off by a secondary winding.

All efforts therefore seem to be made to suppress the resonant rise in order to sustain the circuit.

That's trivial to do. Decrease the Q of the resonating LC circuit (e.g. by adding resistance) or withdraw some of the accumulated AC energy via a secondary winding.

I think  members' time would be better spent on fixing the resonant rise matter rather than designing circuits which measure power.

The "resonant rise matter" can be simply fixed with a load across the secondary winding

Power & energy is what this forum is all about.
It is ludicrous that its members do not use reliable and accurate power & energy measurements that can tell them how far they are from their goal.

[a.king21]

It's nothing unusual. It is the manner in which LC circuits accumulate AC energy. 
They only accumulate what is put into them - "resonant rise" does not create any additional energy.  It can destroy electronic components if the Q of the LC tank is high and the accumulated AC energy circulating in the LC tank is not dissipated by an LCR resistance or siphoned off by a secondary winding.
That's trivial to do. Decrease the Q of the resonating LC circuit (e.g. by adding resistance) or withdraw some of the accumulated AC energy via a secondary winding.
The "resonant rise matter" can be simply fixed with a load across the secondary winding

Power & energy is what this forum is all about.
It is ludicrous that its members do not use reliable and accurate power & energy measurements that can tell them how far they are from their goal.

I and others see it like this:


EVERY experiment we do is looped.


That's why I don't post failures.
So the issue of an accurate power meter is academic.
I have a simple method of testing how near or far I am from OU.
Everything is powered by a battery.
Then I periodically switch the circuit off and check the battery voltage.
The only experiment which succeeded was the Carlos Benitez 4 battery experiment.
After 1 week of continuous use, the battery voltages were the same.


But if you develop an accurate power measurement meter, then good luck.
You remind me of the US in space. They spent millions of dollars developing a pen which
worked in space.
The Russians used a pencil.
Just my 2 cents worth - no offence intended.