Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Tomtech29]

as usually leaves theories beyond understatement how to make
oh, those of his council
further speculation...

[John.K1]

Actually it removes any speculation. I din't have understanding of the special biffilar coil. This normal transformer style makes more sense and I am glad he turned in to this type. He said the biffilar was working only at 1/2 performance.  It makes things now more easier to understand.

[NickZ]

  So, does this mean that we should all now change the inductor coil so that it is NOT bifilar wound, and simply back and forth windings?
  If the grenade 168t output coil was previously wound to 37.5 meters this should be changed to 40 meters, instead? Some more turns added? Did a new magic frequency now appear at the wavelength related with 40 meters???

  I never saw any benefit at all from my current 3 turns yoke coil, to 0.47uf tuning cap, and further to the inductor. It was as if it did not exist. I could connect it, or not connect it up, not much change at the output at my bulbs. But, I'm not using the 2000v tuning caps, either, only the 0.47uf, 275v caps, which could be the reason.
My 168 turns coil is now NOT connected to this grenade inductor coil, which made no difference in my case. Connected or not connected to the 168t coil. I still don't get what that inductor is there for, or what it's supposed to be doing. As the 168t coil is now the main inductor/output coil.  I have a feeling that this 19m inductor, is not really even needed.

  For those interested the first Akula device, here is a video that some of you might like.
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsORNLGYDnE&feature=youtu.be

  But, what we still don't know is if a push-pull configuration is really needed, or can a regular switching oscillator with the same amount of output power going to a yoke/grenade set up have the same effect. Assuming the yoke primary coil is not set up as center tap.

[Hoppy]

Actually it removes any speculation. I din't have understanding of the special biffilar coil. This normal transformer style makes more sense and I am glad he turned in to this type. He said the biffilar was working only at 1/2 performance.  It makes things now more easier to understand.

John.K1,

Did you understand enough from Ruslan's latest video to put together a meaningful schematic? The replacement of the ferrite yoke with a ferrite toroid makes sense, as well as no bifilar coil requirement. However, the whole thing is appearing to look like a conventional transformer with rectified output looking at his initial hand circuit sketch. Is the Kacher still required? Looks like he is back to the drawing board.

[John.K1]

Hi Hoppy.

Actually he was saying something about possibility to use transformer in connection to have device working at 50-60Hz. Nothing else in details.

His hand sketch shows on the left push-pull. On the right side I think it is pick up coil.  Both synchronised and both grounded as he shows. On the output he draw some filter to not mess up LC tank circuit and the diode bridge.  He says do not ask for schematic. It is very easy to make it if you understand the process.

He step down from granade type because the stability and performance of the device was low.  For Tesla he use the oscillator (not kacher - but can be used if you wish)

That's all in brief.