Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Quote from: T-1000 on February 01, 2016, 02:46:44 PM
The video of your setup would help.
In result you want to get minimum consumed current as possible from the power source and contain resonant circuit while covering only resistive losses. The transformation on the output should not be direct magnetic field part.

Just to get idea - here is one of fresh experiments with lighting microwave bulb on the output while the current in consumption stays on minimum when doing modulation of two signals:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLEAwkt6Chc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40v3ylpkmXM

Two observations with the second video: The meter close to the lamp is presumably connected in series with the lamp load. If this is the case then that analoque meter will be insensitive to HF pulsed current. The other analogue meter which is presumably in series with the supply is only glimpsed once very briefly. So all in all, a rather pointless video.

T-1000

Quote from: Hoppy on February 02, 2016, 03:20:32 AM
Two observations with the second video: The meter close to the lamp is presumably connected in series with the lamp load. If this is the case then that analoque meter will be insensitive to HF pulsed current. The other analogue meter which is presumably in series with the supply is only glimpsed once very briefly. So all in all, a rather pointless video.
For the measurements of meters themselves there is another story - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvGGtvkEaIo (old itsu video)
The bulb is not connected to any meters directly in video, also the schematic is in 1st part.

Hoppy

Quote from: T-1000 on February 02, 2016, 04:35:52 AM
For the measurements of meters themselves there is another story - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvGGtvkEaIo (old itsu video)
The bulb is not connected to any meters directly in video, also the schematic is in 1st part.

It really does not matter whether the meter is inductively coupled or direct coupled, as it is not suitable for purpose.

verpies

Quote from: John.K1 on January 31, 2016, 10:55:09 AM
I repeat again  " FORGET KACHER" :)   What you need is sharp pulses synchronized with the current coil. Curent coil has to be able to automatically tune to resonance frequency.
Itsu has a nanosecond kV pulser and he tried synchronizing these nanopulses to the sine waveform...nothing unusual happened.

He is also well equipped to synchronize and track a natural resonance frequency of an LC circuit with his signal generator.

verpies

Quote from: NickZ on February 01, 2016, 08:30:25 AM
I still wonder why Itsu's system couldn't light up his bulbs, (his two bulbs, were quite dim), better than it did. So, that doesn't attract me in the direction of making a TL494/PWM board myself, yet.
How you generate the EM signal does not matter.
How you amplify the EM signal does not matter either.

Signal is a signal, it is defined by its waveform shape, amplitude, frequency and phase relationship to other signals. That's it!

Itsu did not have to build a TL494/PWM board.  He could have program his Function Generator to do all these things, without making any signal generating boards (except for the kV nanopulser). 
I think that he went to the trouble of building such a board only to be true to someone else's design for verification and to enable others who do not have such FG, to continue experimentation.

The only enigma is the element that these signals are applied to, e.g.: yoke, grenade, ferrite rod, etc...