Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

Void i will not argue about that theme with you even because we are only share points of view , but you consider more than one meter enough  to prevent that  bad lecture? And health effects ? This could be real probe ... Its ok  just have careful dont say that  someone not talk about that .
You could find several studies related with that just search and you will find .
About how strong could be the Electro Magnetic field you did answer in best way .  Are you able or not to measure with a convenient tool the how strong could be a field ?
About the shield you even answer about last post .
I would sincerely ear your opinion face you experience with shield systems.
Thanks

Hi Nelson. I have done my own experiments with using metal foil shielding to try to block
EM radiations, and yes, it certainly does reduce such emissions but it will not necessarily
always fully block such radiations. In my own tests it only reduced the EM emissions but
did not fully block them. Effectiveness of course really does depend on exactly how you have setup
your Faraday cage and how thick the mesh or foils are, what materials you are using, and what frequency
ranges and power levels you are testing with, and how close the EM generator is to the Faraday cage, etc.
There are a number of variables that must be considered. The thing to be aware of is just setting up a Faraday
cage is not necessarily going to block out all EM radiations. You must look at all the different factors/variables and
take them all into account.

Here is a video that shows a test using a thick metal garbage can as a Faraday cage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3S2KDuVxaU

P.S. Notice how the expensive RF shielding tape does not work any better than the cheap aluminum foil tape.
The thick metal garbage can only reduces EM radiations and does not fully block them. It is also
pointed out that the effectiveness of any material as an EM shield can vary with frequency.

[nelsonrochaa]

Hi Nelson. I have done my own experiments with using metal foil shielding to try to block
EM radiations, and yes, it certainly does reduce such emissions but it will not necessarily
always fully block such radiations. In my own tests it only reduced the EM emissions but
did not fully block them. Effectiveness of course really does depend on exactly how you have setup
your Faraday cage and how thick the mesh or foils are, what materials you are using, and what frequency
ranges and power levels you are testing with, and how close the EM generator is to the Faraday cage, etc.
There are a number of variables that must be considered. The thing to be aware of is just setting up a Faraday
cage is not necessarily going to block out all EM radiations. You must look at all the different factors/variables and
take them all into account.

Here is a video that shows a test using a thick metal garbage can as a faraday cage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3S2KDuVxaU

Thanks Void  about your opinion in that subject,
But i will say again :
Half of watt  low voltage (9v) is used in input , 230khz of frequency are used.
The box is made by 2,5cm wood with inside plates with 0,3 mm and with comercial mesh made by aluminum (you could find info in the link)
The coil are about 70cm far from the box .
So what i ask you is :
Is supposed if normal RF waves penetrate inside the box and able to power the bulb  ? Or normally with such lower input it will be almost impossible that happens ?
Hope you can answer me thanks
   

[SeaMonkey]

...
It is, but if one remebers what "scalar" or "pseudoscalar" really means, then rigor can be maintained and esoterics avoided.

Many of us do hope to preserve the true meanings
of technical terms but, unfortunately, our wishes
turn out to be just that:  Wishes.

Corruption of language and particularly the
corruption of technical scientific language has
become a sign of the times in which we now
live.  It seems to be un-stoppable.  Words take
on new meanings constantly and it seems that
a certain element of the population delights in
aiding the corruption.

Blame America and Hip-Hop.

[Void]

Thanks Void  about your opinion in that subject,
But i will say again :
Half of watt  low voltage (9v) is used in input , 230khz of frequency are used.
The box is made by 2,5cm wood with inside plates with 0,3 mm and with comercial mesh made by aluminum (you could find info in the link)
The coil are about 70cm far from the box .
So what i ask you is :
Is supposed if normal RF waves penetrate inside the box and able to power the bulb  ? Or normally with such lower input it will be almost impossible that happens ?
Hope you can answer me thanks

Hi Nelson. Maybe I have missed something. The video I saw from you showed a box with one complete
side of the box left open. If that is the test you are referring to, then that does not constitute a Faraday
cage. The box would have to be completely and tightly enclosed on all sides by the metal shielding.
As I have already mentioned, in my own experience a low power EM generator can easily produce strong EM fields around it
for at least several feet depending on the exact circuit configuration. You should also be aware that in close proximity
to the EM generator you are within the near fields of the EM generator, so the effectiveness of a Faraday cage
may not be the same for near fields as it is with far fields. Within the near fields you have separate electric and
magnetic fields around the generator. At low frequencies in the kHz range, near fields extend for quite a large distance
as it is wavelength dependent. Outside the near field perimeter is where the electric and magnetic fields combine into EM wave
radiations.

Nelson, I am not sure what you are objecting to exactly. I have only pointed out that Faraday cages will not necessarily
fully reduce EM radiations. How much the EM radiations are reduced depends on various factors.

[Dog-One]

Take a peek of this video.  Near the end Tinsel places a CFL inside the "shielded" can and the light does not come on until he introduces a "source" externally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6uQUxC7DS8

For comparison to Nelson's demonstration, are we seeing the same thing or something quite different?