Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 209 Guests are viewing this topic.

Enjoykin2017

Quote from: forest on September 23, 2016, 06:16:51 AM
How is ferrite ring transformer wound in * Преобразователь для питания ТТ или качера.pdf = Power converter or Switch power supply for TT or Katcher. ? What is the output power ?[/size]

Try this way !!  :)

Enjoykin2017

Quote from: NickZ on September 23, 2016, 10:22:09 AM
   What I'm seeing is that even with what we are calling the "amplification effect", the bulbs are not lit to anywhere close to the lumin levels of normal grid powered bulbs.  This goes for ALL self runners. Including the Akula and Ruslan devices, and any other replication efforts. OU is not a prerequisite for self running!!! 
  Stop looking for OU,  as OU does not exists, and never did, never has, and never will. 
  So, what I get from studying about all this is, is simply to keep experimenting, until the moment of truth. 
  Forget about input to output measurements, and focus on the self running effect, instead.

My dear South-American Serb Nik Zec - if OU does not exist why thaт a lot of very inteligent people who made successful OU devices were brutally killed by governements special services all around the world ??

by chance ??  :o

I don´t think so !!

Second , what about known facts from famous Thomson´s Philadelphia experiment from 1872 year , or Joseph Henry experiment from 1842 years ?

Do you still thinking - OU effect does not exist and OU devices are technical mirage ?

.........................................
From the Gerry Vassilatos book "LOST SCIENCE"

This energy had been accidentally generated in 1872 by Thomson and Houston. Not waves, but rays. Electrical rays. A forgotten phenomenon. Unidirectional electric impulses of great power radiated electric rays, not waves. These rays penetrated all kinds of matter, whether stone and steel alike. The resultant sparks could be drawn from every insulated metal object in the
large building in which the experiment was being performed. Not radiowaves, but electric rays.

Later in that century, Nikola Tesla accidentally observed the same electric ray production. He studied the phenomenon exclusively, developing impulse generators and electric ray projectors. When Tesla speaking of electric rays which evidenced a light-like nature he referred to this phenomenon. Not radiowaves, but electric rays. New light. Dr. Rife had rediscovered this phenomenon. Tesla spoke of his own "millimeter rays", mentioning their "bacteriocidal" value. This same phenomenon had vindicated Tesla's words. Therapeutic properties were demonstrated when precisely controlled.

From the Peter A. Lindemann, book The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity,"

Tesla was truly mystified by this strange new phenomenon, and searched the literature for references to its characteristics. No such reference was found, except in the surreptitious observations of two experimenters. In one case, Joseph Henry observed the magnetization of steel needles by a heavy spark discharge. The extraordinary feature of this observation (1842) lay in the fact that the Leyden jar, whose spark apparently produced the magnetizations, stood on the upper floor of an otherwise electrically impervious building. Brick walls, thick oak doors, heavy stone and iron flooring, tin ceilings. Moreover, the steel needles were housed in a vault in the cellar.

How did the spark affect such a change through such a natural barrier?

Dr. Henry believed that the spark had released special "light-like rays", and these were the penetrating agencies responsible for the magnetizations. metal tabletop. Again reactivating the coil
produced a shrieking silver-white spark, entirely visible to any whom sat in the last row. Wishing to show this to a colleague, Edwin Houston, Thomson made for the door and was abruptly stopped. Touching the brass knob on the otherwise insulated oak door, Thomson received an unexpected sizzling shock. Turning off the Ruhmkorrf Coil, Thomson found it possible to stop the effect. Calling for Edwin, he summarized what had occurred. Then turning the unit back on again, the stinging charge effects returned. The two gentlemen ran  throughout the huge stone, oak, and iron building with insulated metal objects now. Each touch of a penknife or screwdriver to anything metallic, however distant from the coil or insulted from the floor, produced long and continuous white sparks. The account was written up as a short article in Scientific American later in the same year.

In studying each of these two prior observations, events each separated by some thirty years, Tesla perceived an essential unity with that of his own discovery. Each observation was perhaps a slight variant of the very same phenomenon.  Somehow accidentally, each experimenter had managed to produce the explosive supercharging effect. In the case of Dr. Henry, the explosive bursts occurred in a single flash, electrostatic machines being used to accumulate the initial charge. The second case was peculiar, since it evidenced the sustained and continuous production of super-charging effects. The effect was rare because it obviously required very stringent electrical parameters. Tesla deduced this from the simple fact that the effect was so infrequently observed by experimenters the world over. In addition, he was quick to remark concerning the anomalous attributes attached to the phenomenon. Tesla knew that, despite the extremely penetrating effects in each case, he had secured the only means for achieving the "complete" and maximum manifestation of supercharging. His was an apparatus with no equal, capable of releasing an aspect of the electrostatic field which others very apparently had not.

Though discovered by Tesla in 1889, the preliminary observation of this effect was published after an intensive battery of investigations. "The Dissipation of Electricity", published just prior to Christmas of 1892, is the pivotal Tesla lecture. This is the departure point in which Tesla abandons research and development of high frequency alternating current..

What kind of Natural matter can magnetize and electrify heavy isolated matalic objects at very long distances ?
...........................

Why nobody can find Tesla´s famous lecture "The Dissipation of Electricity" , from 1892 year.? Why this Tesla´s lecture is so dangerous to humankind and why is so special.?

Nik Zec удачного дня !!  :)

Enjoykin

NickZ

   Here's a new video that I just posted, showing the device lighting 4 100w bulbs, this time, including the amplification effect of the Kacher circuit, which is running off of the 28t yoke coil.
   The new full bridge rectifier is in place, which does not heat up like my previous one did. And it does provide for higher output from the 28t coil, through the full bridge rectifier/capacitor, to the Kacher's input.

   Conico:  There is no such thing a OU, and there never will be.
However, there can be an additional input source to an open circuit device,  which can allow it to self run. Yet, there is only as much output as what is coming into a system, from this additional source, some call Aether.
But, no OU, as we think of it.
  That is the theory that I'm here to prove. One way or the other.

   The video got cut off at the end, when the camera moved to within a foot of the grenade. This has not happened to me before.
But, now I know that this will happen, if I get too close.

    TopRuslan replication showing lighting 4 100 w bulbs. - YouTube
 

AlienGrey

Quote from: NickZ on September 23, 2016, 05:22:11 PM
   Here's a new video that I just posted, showing the device lighting 4 100w bulbs, this time, including the amplification effect of the Kacher circuit, which is running off of the 28t yoke coil.
   The new full bridge rectifier is in place, which does not heat up like my previous one did. And it does provide for higher output from the 28t coil, through the full bridge rectifier/capacitor, to the Kacher's input.

   Conico:  There is no such thing a OU, and there never will be.
However, there can be an additional input source to an open circuit device,  which can allow it to self run. Yet, there is only as much output as what is coming into a system, from this additional source, some call Aether.
But, no OU, as we think of it.
  That is the theory that I'm here to prove. One way or the other.

   The video got cut off at the end, when the camera moved to within a foot of the grenade. This has not happened to me before.
But, now I know that this will happen, if I get too close.

    TopRuslan replication showing lighting 4 100 w bulbs. - YouTube

make yourself a radiant energy detector use a piece of alloy tube for a handle and 4 fast geranium diodes in a bridge circuit but put a red led as load and use a piece of steel as the aerial detector if memory serves me right see if led lights up when it's by tesla coil use plastic for a box !

conico

Quote from: itsu on September 23, 2016, 04:07:14 PM
conico,

nice setup.


i am puzzeled by that, do you mean there is 512Vpp on the drains of these MOSFETs?
If you are using a 24V supply, there should be ideally 48V max there, with some spikes perhaps 100V.
So what does this 512Vpp looks like?  (scopeshot)
Do you use snubbering to fight these spikes? (if any)

Perhaps you should look into this lossless clamp design from verpies.

572Vpp looks a normal resonance voltage on the inductor/wima caps via the 3t secondary of the yoke with 24V input.


Itsu

I use snubber 2.2nf, 10 Ohm resistor and UF4007 but there are spikes on drain of mosfets more then 380 Vpp, that destroy IRFP260.
Yes, 512 Vpp is on the series caps with the 3 turns and inductor, is what you see on the picture, but on the drain of mosfets is almost the same as spikes.
I tried Verpie's lossless clamp but the problem come from the grenade coil which, maybe influence the Yoke, the same spikes were.
I do believe that Yoke is a 90 degrees coil from grenade coil, very important in Ruslan's device, look the last Akula's device, on the bottom is a toroid at 90 degrees, look Geofusion' movie, he show that yoke must be in a proper place if not the effect disappear, look Kapanadze device the same grenade coil as Ruslan and a 'flower coil' in back of it, at 90 deg.
In one of the Itsu's movie  when he start the Kacher has just 2v more on the load, if the yoke were in the proper place he wold has the effect.
One more think, my inductor coil was very hot 44 deg celsius after one our of work. The wire of my inductor coil is 2.5 mm and has 78 miliH, on Ruslan schemes is 43 mH, I believe Ruslan use 4mm wire for inductor.
How do i stop thous drain spikes?