Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

I commented in an earlier post to Nick, that his Mazilli is unlikely to suffer badly from gate signal distortion caused by HV.

Yes, especially when BJTs are used in the Mazilli circuit.

[Hoppy]

   
   My main concern for now is a proper working feed back path. Any help with that would be appreciated.

Yes, now to the crux of the matter! All schematics I've seen published on the fora, show a simple DC feedback loop directly from output to input of the source PSU, which in most cases is switched-mode. This feedback loop being applied after initial starting of the device by a small battery.

[NickZ]

   Yes, but each device is showing a different way of doing so.
Which way may work best for me?
One consideration for a possible cause of HV interference of the drain or gate signals is the copper PCB which the components are mounted on. Which I don't use either.

[NickZ]

  Verpies:
  After reviewing Willian J Mcfreely's PDF file, concerning OU devices, I come to a different conclusion.
  First of all with all his technical expertise he has not and can not replicate nether the Kapanadze device(s), nor the PTU device.
Which he explains as his opinion of examples of working NMR modes of operation.
  He does mention that some of what he calls NMR type devices do process radioactive properties, and should be shielded. Although he does also state that Beta radiations can also be emitted by some NMR devices, yet gives no clue as to how to shield those types of very dangerous radiations, other than saying that aluminum should be used as shielding. But, we know that aluminum will not work, in the case of Beta radiations. And which are not just simpler electron radiations of short duration.
  "What radiation" you had asked,  them there Alfa/Beta radiations,  I would answer.
 
  The article is full of unproven speculations, nor a self working device built by him to prove his point.
  In this case, and without going into further details, I would say,  "I don't buy it". 
 
   When a self running device using the principals of operation of NMR can be shown, and proven as to it cause and effect, and built without dangerous radiations, then, I'll consider further looking into it.
But, for now...  "I don't buy it".  Even if it were for sale, which it's not.  Nor would I want it in my home.

[verpies]

After reviewing Willian J Mcfreely's PDF file, concerning OU devices, I come to a different conclusion.
First of all with all his technical expertise he has not and can not replicate nether the Kapanadze device(s), nor the PTU device.

That assumption is based on your expectation of him bragging about such achievement.

Which he explains as his opinion of examples of working NMR modes of operation.

It is wrong to conflate the NMR with McFreey's technique, because the former is only a component of the latter.
NMR does not produce pulses of fast electrons (beta particles) by itself.

He does mention that some of what he calls NMR type devices do process radioactive properties, and should be shielded.

Devices based on the McFreey principle indeed would produce fast electrons internally, but devices based on NMR alone would not.

Anyway, calling these fast electrons radioactive is wrong because it gives the wrong impressions that you can eat them or breath them inside where they will do damage.  That is not true of fast electrons, which do not linger nor penetrate beyond light metal shielding.
You need to learn to distinguish between radioactive materials (such as beta emitters) from the beta particles themselves.

...yet gives no clue as to how to shield those types of very dangerous radiations, other than saying that aluminum should be used as shielding. But, we know that aluminum will not work, in the case of Beta radiations.

There is some mistake in your research.  Aluminum completely stops fast electrons (beta particles).  Maybe you confused aluminum with lead, with converts beta particles into X-rays, albeit it stops them, too.

"What radiation" you had asked,  them there Alfa/Beta radiations,  I would answer.

You need to learn to distinguish between radioactive materials (such as alpha or beta emitters) from the particles that they emit.
The former are dangerous, the latter are not after proper shielding is applied (clothing stops alphas and aluminum stops betas).

Gammas and neutrons are a different story.
 

The article is full of unproven speculations, nor a self working device built by him to prove his point.
When a self running device using the principals of operation of NMR can be shown, and proven as to it cause and effect, and built without dangerous radiations, then, I'll consider further looking into it.

Maybe but maybe the STAAAR Yoke device and TK, Dally, Akula devices, already work unknowingly based on this principle.
Anyway that explanation is much more rigorous that the energy from the ambient, which does not withstand even the simplest logical analysis.

If you hold the author to such high standards of empirical proof, you should hold TK & Akula, etc... to them, too.