Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Hoppy]

Nick,

As Batman has explained in his scope shots and I have experienced with my setup, the kacher is responsible for altering duty cycle and this in turn results in producing the 'effect' you are trying to produce. When you are back up and running, try disconnecting one of the fets from its driver to see if this improves lamp brightness and gives a more pronounced 'effect' than with both fets in circuit. By the way, the term 'to smoke' or 'magic smoke' in electronics applies to the act of burning out electronic circuits or components and therefore equally applies to exploding caps by reverse polarity or over-voltage.

[Grumage]

Nick,

As Batman has explained in his scope shots and I have experienced with my setup, the kacher is responsible for altering duty cycle and this in turn results in producing the 'effect' you are trying to produce. When you are back up and running, try disconnecting one of the fets from its driver to see if this improves lamp brightness and gives a more pronounced 'effect' than with both fets in circuit. By the way, the term 'to smoke' or 'magic smoke' in electronics applies to the act of burning out electronic circuits or components and therefore equally applies to exploding caps by reverse polarity or over-voltage.

Good afternoon Hoppy.

Yes indeed, and once the smoke is " let out of the box " finito .....

I think AlienGrey suggested driving the yoke into a non inductive load like some 55 watt car headlamp bulbs to see how it performed, have you tried this Nick?

Cheers Graham.

[Hoppy]

Good Afternoon to you Grum.

Yes, as you suggest, a non-inductive load would be a good thing for Nick to try in order to test out correct operation of TL494, drivers and fets. Its all too easy to spike and smoke the fets with insufficient snubbing. The Kacher upsets the duty cycle control from the TL494 and also stresses the voltage regulators, resulting in a device that is unstable in operation, with the 'effect' being a primary observation.

[Void]

Hi Hoppy. How's things?

Any further thoughts from anyone on what might be the basis for the mentioned 'current amplification'?
I know it has been tossed around previously here, but just curious if Kapanadze or anyone else revealed anything further
that might be considered at all 'new' in this regard. Even a seemingly tiny insignificant detail might potentially prove
much more significant than it appears on the surface, and, if the Kapanadze devices are indeed real, then the actual effect
people are looking for may possibly be much simpler to produce than it might appear from Kapanadze's devices.
That's my hunch anyway...
All the best...

[Hoppy]

Hi Void,

Unfortunately no further thoughts, other than a strong rumour on the fora, apparently arising from an alleged comment made by Kapanadze, that the device is primarily electrostatic based, rather than electro-magnetic. However, don't ask me for the source, as I cannot find it again.