Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Void]

Hi Nick. Sure, it's good to try different things. I built the PWM driver because I want
to run tests at higher power. I am not trying to replicate the Akula/Ruslan setup at the
current time. I am still running experiments with the purpose of trying to figure out
the principles behind the ever elusive OU effect.
All the best...

[Hoppy]

 
 

  These devices are NOT just like conventional electronics, where the top of the square wave should normally be flat, as possible.
  Look at Stalker's best drain signals, below.  Look at my signals, (below Stalkers), which I am working to emulate.


                                                                                           NickZ

It would certainly appear that a chaotic type waveform is needed Nick. However, I don't understand how you are going to determine which type of waveform is closer / better than another to approach self-running when you do not have a feedback loop setup, or any voltage and current monitoring of source power supply and means to determine power dissipation in load. I think a feedback loop of some type is very likely to have an effect on the D-S waveforms. Are the waveforms from Stalker & Ruslan with or without feedback loop?

[GeoFusion]

NickZ,
Unconventional tech and operations it is .

(All) My snubbers do get warm but they can turn out to be very hot and even burn out the resistors, which
happend alot of time in trail. At some point when i experimented months ago, it blew the Caps of the snubber circuit.
But right now with the setting I currently have now, the resistors are warm but can be touched , Fets are cold to the touch.
I will be adding a additional circuit right be for the Fets able to control both fets timing and delay,
which will allow me to control them separately.
Next I will need to see what I can do to step up the output... it's uncharted waters again . DC is next to see...
Distance of Antenna and Inductor (tesla-bifilar) made a big difference this time, since 28T was not used.


Void ,
The non dissipative snubber looks interesting, wonder if it would still allow the synchronization to follow up
if someone tries it out on there bench.

Hoppy,
alright

magpwr,
yes, High Freq & High amps. the mixture.
all is recorded. soon enough to show on scope what's happening.



                                 Cheerz~

[AlienGrey]

Geo Hi there hope all is well with you, you certainly have an interesting video your showing, I would be really interested in seeing some of your inter system scope shots. If you have a 4 beam device can you possibly display the 2 push pull inputs and the cores output and if possible the katchers drive wave form, as all would be most interesting.

Void nice artical,  but I cant make out what the diodes are as symbol is for shottkey diodes but could be zeners, I mention this as your sample scope shot still shows large voltage spikes.

Nick your scope shot of toroid input has a lot of ringing when the FETs should be on, what is the drive to the FETs like ?

Try to keep the supply feed short and decoupled with LF captive caps between Sauce or Emitters and drive coil supply also have you tried ferrite beads on your Fets  Gate feed ? they are used a lot in conventional equipment to stop parasitic osculation.

Hope this helps


Kind regards AG

[NickZ]

It would certainly appear that a chaotic type waveform is needed Nick. However, I don't understand how you are going to determine which type of waveform is closer / better than another to approach self-running when you do not have a feedback loop setup, or any voltage and current monitoring of source power supply and means to determine power dissipation in load. I think a feedback loop of some type is very likely to have an effect on the D-S waveforms. Are the waveforms from Stalker & Ruslan with or without feedback loop?

  Hoppy: Well, there is only one way to find out if something works, or not, and that is to try it out.
  I am not yet at the point of adding a feed back path. I need to have my device working right, not overheating, and putting out a use able gain, first. I still can't run it for over a minute, due to these snubbers resistor or fets getting too hot. So, there is something that is NOT right with most all of the schematics, such as with Stalker's schematics. Which shows NO snubbers, at all.
I would have 350v peaks without any snubbers on, so those diagrams and circuits, just can't be the right way to go.
   
   There are still a lot of unknowns, one of them is the fact that no self runner has been shown outputting more than it's taking in.
Such as what you are suggesting that I do, or show. With or without the feed back loop.
But, I don't care too much about seeing comparative power readings, I care about self running, instead. That will be my proof.  I'll let you guys deal with input to output values, as you are the ones interested in such readings. Ultimately, that won't matter in any case. Only self running matters, for me at this time, not where the extra input is coming from, or just how to measure it.