Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Hoppy]

Hey Guys!!! I dont want to push in that direction at all...  My previous post was to make some light on things I have OBSERVED along this tread.. Most of the guy that intent to REPLICATE Nelson device find a dead end because they try to MIMIC the unit instead of  having a global vision of why it is working this way..  In my first comment I PROPOSED a new END to an EXITER circuit...  The trouble is not the circuit itself..  The question is HOW to tap in the OUTPUT and not effecting the input to much... If we can TAP the output and TRANSFORM it to our purpose, then the next step is possible..  Let me propose you this schematic...


If the joule theif can be turned to an AC output and have an output of roughly COP 2.1,  HOW TO TURN THE COP to our advantage???  The output is the KEY..

Pepper10,

Please explain why you think that the Joule Thief circuit you posted could have a COP 2.1. Do you have any build data to support this suggestion?

[AlienGrey]

Hi Void,

Not intentional, just got carried away trying to trace that Eau de OU scent. 

Whilst the 2004 contraption appears not to have the 3-phase coils, they may have been enclosed in the tin can.

Err whats all this
Eau de OU....  is that Wasser ? have you all been on the schnapps ?

Nick, Void and others keep rattling on about COP  we all know what it means but as it's not listed on Google or the Oxford dictionary or on line, what are the  words is is abbreviating ? 
Also look at circuit again it's not closed loop but he has missed out 0v battery, your brain is amusing the earth connection is battery contact  connection and if Nelsons device isn't a exciting jewel thief what is it ? 

[Hoppy]

Jewel thief yes. Exciting in what way?

[NickZ]

   It has been commented that Nelson's device is just a joule thief, or an Exciter.
   In his own words, Nelson has mentioned that it is not just an exciter or joule thief.

   Joule thiefs, do not self run. Nor do normal Exciter circuits. And that is why Nelson's device is neither of the mentioned oscillator circuits.

  The name Joule Thief was to note that the simple circuit could take a dead 1.5v battery down to 0.5v, or even less. While been able to light a 3v led, off of a single dead 1.5v battery.
However, not every oscillator circuit is a joule thief, nor exciter, and much less will self run.

   If you want to call it a joule thief, or exciter, that's up to you. But, it would not be correct.
   I think that the main difference is that his circuits will self run, and do so by a system that no one else has achieved, and is still partially secret, especially his last shown self runner.

[Hoppy]

Nick,

The circuit that Nelson posted will not self-run. Build it and find out for yourself.