Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

   Itsu:    OK I watched the video,  everything seems to be working properly, so far.
    Good luck with the kacher driver part.

    If you listen to his kacher signal,  it sounds like a machine gun when tuned to the right frequency.
So,  this should work great.

[T-1000]

Hi all,


In terms of katcher control, there are 3 needed:


1) Pulse burst position on push-pull dead-time. This is sine wave top in series resonance
2) Pulse width for katcher on-time
3) Abrupt free oscillations shut-off position for making spikes on Tesla coil


Stalker circuit is just following this. Hopefully that clarify your confusion about additional delay module in circuit.


Cheers!

[itsu]

Thanks T,

so this TC4093 between the TL494 and the push-pull MOSFET (drivers) is a delay module.

But it also seems to influence (decrease) the TL494 output signals individually, so my next quation is what is the TL494 duty cycle setting, is it max. (44% for each channel)
or already decreased to 33%, and then fed into this TC4493?

Regards Itsu

[AlienGrey]

Katcher control EXPERIMENT!
Hi all Stalker does do it a long way round you could do that with only one chip and a mosfet driver. As in the Nalli circuit, the delay you seek can be made by adding a 4.7k to each output pin driver of the TL494 with a 1 nan down to earth and take off point is the 1n and 4kt on both sides.

Every thing else is done on the following control card to drive the Katcher out put at the correct time.

[NickZ]

Thanks T,

so this TC4093 between the TL494 and the push-pull MOSFET (drivers) is a delay module.

But it also seems to influence (decrease) the TL494 output signals individually, so my next quation is what is the TL494 duty cycle setting, is it max. (44% for each channel)
or already decreased to 33%, and then fed into this TC4493?

Regards Itsu

  Itsu:  It doesn't look like we have much choice in the 33% duty cycle, even if you adjust the TL494 to it's full duty setting.     
  Normally, Stalker runs the push pull at about 43% or so. But, with the TC4093 between the TL494 and the push-pull driver, it may work ok at 33%.  He may make up for the losses of the lower duty cycle, by raising the Kacher transistor input to a higher voltage value, such as the 50v to 200v. OR not?

   I don't understand why some guys are showing the Kacher signal firing on top of the induction circuit square wave, and others are firing it on the off cycle. So, which is it...   In any case, it looks like the Stalker circuit with it's controllable bursts, on top of the induction circuit square wave is the best approach. Or maybe it makes little difference if it's on top of the wave form, or on the off cycle. In anycase, it looks like Stalker's circuit won't fire at the off cycle, the way he has it. So, on the tops, it is.
   EDIT:   I will order the needed parts today, and will have to wait about a week or so, to know if those components are all available.